"I could've changed their hearts"
![]() April 20, 2023 How’s it hanging, Meteor readers? Weed like to wish a happy 4/20 to all who celebrate. As you may know, I live in Texas where weed is not legal, so I will not be participating. Hear that, local law enforcement? None for me, thanks. Never even touched the stuff. ![]() Of course, as Rev. Dr. Jacqui Lewis points out, a true 4/20 celebration would be liberating the over 40,000 people currently imprisoned for marijuana possession, especially when Black people are 3.64 times more likely than white people to be arrested for it. (Meanwhile, 81% of cannabis business owners in states where it is legal are white.) In today’s newsletter, we take a look at the passionate defense one state rep made for trans people—and the punishment she’s facing as a result. Definitely not blazing it, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ON“Blood on your hands”: In 2022, Montanans elected their first openly trans state representative, Zooey Zephyr. And on Tuesday, House Republicans called for her censure, the harshest form of punishment short of expulsion and a measure typically doled out after acts like tax fraud or making an animated video of yourself killing AOC and Joe Biden. And what had Zephyr done to provoke this punishment? She passionately defended trans people. It all went down Tuesday on the Montana House floor. During a debate over a proposed bill blocking gender-affirming care for trans youth, Zephyr told her Republican colleagues: “If you vote yes on this bill, I hope the next time you bow your heads in prayer, you see the blood on your hands.” The clip went viral, but what most viewers might not know is that Zephyr was speaking literally: Less than a month ago, she later shared, each member of the Montana legislature had received a letter from a local doctor whose partner was treating a suicidal trans teenager in the ER. The child had cited the current legislative session as their top stressor, telling doctors, “My state doesn’t want me.” After Zephyr’s remarks, the Montana legislature’s Freedom Caucus called for her censure, linking her so-called “hateful rhetoric” with the Covenant Christian School shooting in Nashville (which conservatives have tried to paint as an act of “trans terrorism” despite the fact that investigators have been unable to find a motive). The caucus also deliberately misgendered her in its statement. Before she was elected to office, Zephyr had spent years fighting for human rights legislation in her city of Missoula (notoriously one of the bluest areas of Montana). But in 2021, when she saw two anti-LGBTQ bills pass the state legislature by just one vote apiece (SB 215 and SB 280), she decided to run for office. She said in an interview during her campaign, “I know damn well that I could’ve changed their hearts if I had access to these people the way the legislators do.” Even if Zephyr’s actions don’t end up changing the vote, her words have reached far outside the state capitol. Republicans described her language as “inappropriate and uncalled-for,” but to the millions of people who care about trans kids, nothing could be more called for in a moment like this. AND:
![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
The health crisis facing Black mothers
Plus: A human rights ruling with a big old asterisk
![]() April 13, 2023 Hello, my lovely Meteor readers, Have you done your taxes yet? No shame if you haven’t. Personally, I just finished mine last night…only to have it rejected. (Apparently, Form Blah-Blah needed a cross-reference to Form Such-and-Such or whatever.) I know I’m nowhere near the first or the last to say it, but why is this whole process so damn hard? Just tell me what I owe you and let me be! We’ve got a jam-packed newsletter for you all today: a glass-half-empty mifepristone ruling; a multimillion-dollar debt-burning ceremony; Black Maternal Health week; and the hit TV show “A League of Their Own” is BACK! (Sort of.) ![]() And don’t forget to vote for us in the 27th Annual People’s Voice Webby Awards. We’ve been nominated for News & Politics and Public Service & Activism in their social media category. Both of our entries are about abortion, and if you agree that telling these stories is crucial right now, we’d be grateful for your vote! Double-checking my Form Such-and-Such, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONThe fight for mifepristone continues: After Trump-appointed Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled late last Friday that the FDA should revoke its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone, despite over twenty years of its safe and effective use, the (also mostly Trump-appointed) 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided late last night to partially overrule this decision. This ruling avoids the pill’s outright suspension for now; the three-judge panel determined that, since the FDA first approved mifepristone in the year 2000, too much time had passed for the approval to be revoked and that doing so would have “significant public consequences.” But the ruling also comes with some heavy asterisks. The court upheld Kacsmaryk’s ruling that some of the FDA’s more recent changes to make the pill more accessible should be suspended, including:
At times, the court’s 42-page decision even parrotted the anti-abortion rhetoric used in Kacsmaryk’s case, intentionally using the scary-but-bogus term “chemical abortion” and at one point referring to a fetus or embryo as “an unborn child.” The judges also claimed that “as a result of the FDA’s failure to regulate this potent drug,” the harm done by the pill is “sufficiently concrete.” Sufficiently concrete? Not exactly! Thanks to a wonderful report from The Washington Post detailing all the science Kacsmaryk ignored (and all the flawed pseudoscience he relied on instead), we know that of the 5.6 million people who used mifepristone between the year 2000 and last June, only 28 mifepristone-related deaths were reported, making the drug safer than penicillin. And even in those 28 cases (some of which involved overdoses or pre-existing conditions), the evidence is too incomplete and inconclusive to demonstrate any cause of death to mifepristone. The Justice Department announced Thursday that it would ask the Supreme Court to block the 5th Circuit’s ruling and protect access to mifepristone. Given SCOTUS’s current makeup, it’s hard to be optimistic. But some argue that the FDA could just refuse to comply, and we may find out soon how real that possibility is. AND:
![]() ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
What's next for the abortion pill
![]() April 11, 2023 Dear Meteor readers, As you’ve probably heard by now, a Texas judge ruled late on Friday that the FDA approval of the abortion pill mifepristone should be revoked, potentially threatening access everywhere to the medication (which has been used, safely, for 23 years). As a born-and-raised Houstonian, I’m used to having to deal with Texas’ bullshit. But it’s absolutely devastating to see one extremist’s decision ripple nationwide. In today’s newsletter, we parse the aftermath of Kacsmaryk’s unprecedented ruling. On the happy side, though: Hannah Gadsby’s got a new special on its way! Plus, female superheroes! (Can they go to Texas?) Holding you all as tight as I can, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ON![]() THREE MIFEPRISTONE PILLS IN DECEMBER 2000, THE YEAR THE PILL WAS APPROVED SAFE FOR USE BY THE FDA (PHOTO BY BILL GRENBLATT/LIAISON VIA GETTY IMAGES) What the abortion pill mess means: In a highly anticipated court case, Texas Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled Friday that the FDA should revoke their approval of mifepristone, a pill used in about half of all abortions nationwide. Despite being one of the safest and most studied medications available, Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee with long-held anti-abortion views and a penchant for dressing his toddler in anti-abortion baby duds, wrote in his 67-page opinion that the FDA had “acquiesced on its legitimate safety concerns” in the face of “significant political pressure” to “increased ‘access’ to chemical abortion.” First off: “chemical abortion” is a label meant to portray these safe medications as unhealthy, which they aren’t. Second: This is going to backfire on extremists, believes Cecile Richards, former CEO of Planned Parenthood. “Republican leadership is going to be absolutely on the defense now for the next 18 months,” she told The 19th News Friday; recent polls show widespread public support for legal abortion. Of the 38 current Republican senators who voted to confirm Kacsmaryk, only one, Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi, has publicly celebrated the decision. Response to Kacsmaryk has been swift: In a separate ruling issued late Friday night, a Washington judge ordered the government to keep mifepristone available in 17 states and D.C., noting that the drug is safe and effective. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice asked the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday to block the Texas decision. And in a genius move, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healy revealed Monday that she had already stockpiled almost two years’ worth of mifepristone in advance of Kacsmaryk’s decision. (Washington Gov. Jay Inslee’s supply sits at around three years.) Thankfully, mifepristone is not the only abortion pill available; the World Health Organization has approved of misoprostol-only abortions for years. However, taking misoprostol on its own leads to more side effects: cramps, nausea/vomiting, fevers, and even incomplete abortions—all side effects mifepristone helps alleviate. (It also takes longer to work, so patients traveling out of state to take them may have to be gone longer.) In other words: If this ruling holds, abortions will get even less safe than they were…all thanks to a court case ostensibly concerned with mifepristone’s safety. As Amanda Marcotte wrote for Salon, this ruling “serves no other purpose but to punish patients who seek abortion by making the process more miserable than it needs to be.” The inhumanity isn’t a side effect; it’s the goal. So what’s next? In all likelihood, this case will go to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals and, if it’s upheld there, make its way to the Supreme Court. And in the meantime, organizers will keep doing what they’ve been doing all day every day for years, and especially since last June: They’ll help make abortion as accessible as possible. You can help by donating to abortion funds. You can stay tuned, and stay angry. ![]() FLOWERS LAID ON THE STEPS OF THE OLD NATIONAL BANK, WHERE A SHOOTING TOOK PLACE MONDAY (PHOTO BY MICHAEL SWENSEN/LIAISON VIA GETTY IMAGES) AND:
![]() ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
Jane Goodall in her own words
![]() April 6, 2023 Guess what, Meteor readers? I am absolutely THRILLED to announce that The Meteor has been nominated for a Webby! Our reporting on Amanda Zurawski, a Texas woman who went into sepsis after being denied an abortion for a life-threatening pregnancy, is up for the Public Service & Activism award in the Social Video category (alongside Barack Obama, no less). Make sure you hop on over and give us (and our producing partners, Harness, O4RJ, and Firebrand) a vote! ![]() Today’s newsletter has it all: unethical Supreme Court Justice behavior, progressive election wins, and Washington’s plan to stockpile mifepristone in case it becomes illegal. And if you missed our talk with Dr. Jane Goodall at the Brooklyn Museum on Tuesday, don’t worry: We’ve got a recap full of murderous chimpanzees and fierce observations. Crossing my fingers and thanking the Academy, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONHigh court, low standards: A new report from ProPublica has revealed that for decades, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has accepted (but failed to disclose) numerous gifts from a major Republican donor. The anti-abortion/anti-gay/anti-good judge has made it a habit of taking unreported luxurious vacations, private flights, yacht trips, stays at resorts, you name it—all financed by Harlan Crow, a man who has donated over $10 million to conservative political organizations. Compared to other branches of government, Supreme Court justices have fewer restrictions on the sorts of gifts they have to disclose. (Members of Congress, for example, cannot accept anything valued over $50 without prior approval.) But they are required to disclose gifts over $415; to name one example, Thomas’ nine-day trek across Indonesia via private jet & yacht would have cost over $500k had he paid for it himself. It’s hard to say any of this will matter in the long run; after all, this isn’t the first time that Thomas has ignored judicial ethical expectations and come out consequence-free. But the situation does highlight a need for more enforceable restrictions when it comes to Supreme Court justices’ behavior. As Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin told CNBC in response to ProPublica’s report, “The highest court in the land shouldn’t have the lowest ethical standards.” AND:
![]() ![]() CELEBRATING 89 YEARSA Fireside Chat with Dr. Jane GoodallShe spoke with The Meteor about her early love of animals and how, despite the reality of climate change, she remains hopeful. ![]() DR. JANE GOODALL WITH HER BELOVED STUFFED ANIMALS (PHOTO BY KOLIN MENDEZ PHOTOGRAPHY) Tuesday night, we had the absolute pleasure of hosting a talk with renowned ethologist and activist Dr. Jane Goodall at the Brooklyn Museum to celebrate her 89th birthday. With a glass of whiskey in one hand and a retinue of stuffed animals on the table beside her, Dr. Goodall sat down with Meteor founding member, writer and illustrator Mona Chalabi to reflect on her life, her legacy, and her longing for a healthier planet. The evening started with poetry from Jade Lozada, an address from Commons founder and CEO Sanchali Pal, and environmental activist Ayisha Siddiqa in conversation with The Meteor’s Treasure Brooks. Here are some of our favorite stories from the night. Spoiler alert: Her favorite animal is apparently not a chimpanzee. ![]() AYISHA SIDDIQA AND TREASURE BROOKS IN CONVERSATION OPENING THE EVENT (PHOTO BY KOLIN MENDEZ PHOTOGRAPHY)
When Dr. Goodall was only a year and a half old, her mother found her in bed with a handful of live earthworms. Most mothers, she recounted, would probably have told her, “Oh, throw those dirty things out.” Instead, her mother noticed how Jane was studying the worms, as if she were wondering how they moved around without legs. Gently, she told her daughter, “I think we’d better take them in the garden, because they might die in your bed.” That (and a childhood crush on Tarzan) sparked her dream of going to Africa to study animals. “No thought of being a scientist—that wasn’t for women back then,” Goodall recalled. “And everybody laughed at me: ‘You’ll get to Africa, it’s far away, we don’t know much about it, it’s full of dangerous wild animals, and you’re just a girl.’” Her mother encouraged her, though: “Jane, if you really want to do something like this, then you have to work really hard, take advantage of every opportunity. And if you don’t give up, hopefully you’ll find a way.” Which she did.
Dr. Goodall’s first trip to study chimpanzees in Tanzania started quite rough. For the first few months, her main exposure to them was “seeing their backsides vanishing into the forest,” she says. . But finally, a chimp named David Greybeard let his guard down around her, leading to a revolutionary breakthrough: Humans were not the only animal who used tools. She described watching David as he stripped a twig of its branches so that it would fit into termite holes, using it to fish them out for a quick snack. “At that time, science had decided that humans, and only humans, could make tools. We were defined as ‘Man the Tool User,’” Goodall said. “So I owe David a lot.”
Dr. Goodall had headed to Tanzania with no college degree; she’d trained as a secretary. But after her discovery, her boss, Dr. Louis Leakey sent her directly to Cambridge. “He said there was no time for an undergraduate degree,” she recalled. While there, she was admonished by a professor for giving the chimpanzees names—and for talking about “their personality, their minds, or their emotions.” The conventional wisdom at the time, the professor reminded her, was that only humans had those. But Goodall knew this wasn’t the case. The more she studied the chimpanzees, the more she observed their personalities at work: the relationships between mothers and their children; lifetime familial bonds; adoption; grief; war. She recalled how “the male will stand upright, have a furious scowl on his face and shake his fist, and it’s all about how. It reminds me so much of two male human politicians.” (At this point, the Brooklyn Museum audience laughed, and Goodall coyly continued: “And I didn’t say a name, did I?”)
If humans aren’t the only animals with personalities, then it follows that humans aren’t the only animals who can be “bad.” Dr. Goodall told the story of a chimpanzee named Passion, who killed and ate several other mothers’ babies for no discernible reason. Not only that, but she treated her own children terribly, leading Goodall to conclude, “There’s nice chimpanzees and unpleasant ones—just like people.” And that’s why her own favorite animal isn’t a chimp—but a dog.
Dr. Goodall explained that not only is animal farming environmentally destructive, but it’s a cruel thing to do when “every one of those animals [are] individuals. They can feel fear and pain, and they have personalities and characters—although they can’t express them.” She talked about her organization Roots & Shoots, which has helped hundreds of thousands of young people across 68 countries develop personal projects that make a positive impact on the environment. Though the damage done to our planet can feel overwhelming at times, Goodall believes collaborative endeavors are the way forward. “If we put all these actions together, small actions can cumulatively move us towards a world that’s better.” Or, if you’re a billionaire: “Write out a big check to the Jane Goodall Institute.” ![]() MONA CHALABI TOASTS TO DR. GOODALL'S 89TH BIRTHDAY(PHOTO BY KOLIN MENDEZ PHOTOGRAPHY) FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
"This is for the girls that look like me"
![]() April 4, 2023 Hello again, Meteor readers, Happy Trump Arrest Day to all who celebrate! In case you hadn’t yet heard, the former Home Alone 2 actor surrendered to authorities today, facing 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. Unfortunately, it’s unlikely we’ll ever have the sweet satisfaction of getting to see his mug shot—even if he does end up taking one. We’ll just have to satisfy ourselves with these AI-generated substitutions. (Look at him go!) We’ve got a bit of a short one today because we’re in conversation with Dr. Jane Goodall tonight at the Brooklyn museum. If you can’t join us in person, you can still watch the livestream here. ![]() Today’s newsletter still has it all, though: powerful trans allyship, racial double standards, and an announcement from the Vatican that came 500 years too late. In celebration, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ON![]() “For the girls that look like me”: On Sunday, college basketball star Angel Reese was named Most Outstanding Player of 2023 after leading the LSU Tigers to victory in the NCAA Women’s Championship. She also set the measure for most double-doubles in a single season with a total of 34. But all anyone can seem to talk about is…the fact that she did some light trash-talking? After her win, Reese did the “John Cena,” waving her hand in front of her face at rival player Caitlin Clark. Pundits derided the move as “classless”—despite the fact that Clark herself did the same move earlier in the tournament. In the post-game press conference, Reese responded to the double standards: “I don't fit in a box that y'all want me to be in. I'm too hood. I'm too ghetto. But when other people do it, y'all say nothing. So this was for the girls that look like me, that's going to speak up on what they believe in. It's unapologetically you." As our own Mik said on Instagram yesterday, “When do we see this debutante-level decorum ever expected from male players?” A word of advice: Maybe if you are going to call a Black woman “classless,” make sure you’re holding everyone else to the same standard. AND:
![]() ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
What the hell is "abortion trafficking"?
![]() March 30, 2023 Greetings and salutations, Meteor readers, We’re reaching the end of Women’s History Month, which means today’s issue contains our last slice of history. But don’t worry, it’s a good one: This newsletter’s beloved Shannon Melero has briefly poked her head out from maternity leave to tell us a fascinating story about freedom fighter Lolita Lebrón. We also take a look at the frightening new anti-abortion bill creeping its way toward the Idaho Senate. (What the hell does “abortion trafficking” even mean??) But first: the news. Getting ready for April, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONUnder His Eye-daho: The latest horrifying twist in the attack on abortion patients: Idaho, which has already completely banned abortions with very narrow exceptions, is set to pass a bill effectively prohibiting minors from traveling literally anywhere to get one. House Bill 242, which passed in the House and will likely pass quickly in Idaho’s Republican-led Senate, seeks to establish the new, so-called crime of “abortion trafficking.” Under this bill, any adult who helps any minor receive an abortion without a parent’s permission—whether in or out-of-state—could be charged with a felony punishable by two to five years in prison. (That includes grandparents, aunts, friends, or abortion-fund volunteers.) But there’s more: H.B. 242 also forbids adults from helping minors obtain “an abortion-inducing drug”—such as mifepristone, which is already under attack. In other words, under this bill, any adult who even drives a teenager to a store or the Post Office to pick up the mifepristone they ordered could be charged with (say it with me) “abortion trafficking.” The bill also includes a civil clause allowing any family member of someone who obtained an abortion—or the person who impregnated them—to sue any medical professional involved up to four years later. The only exception made is if the pregnancy was the result of rape of incest. So to recap: If you’re a minor and you get pregnant in Idaho after this bill passes, you can’t get an abortion. You can’t get help to travel to another state for an abortion. You can’t get a ride to Mail Boxes Etc. if you order an abortion pill in the mail. Basically, no trusted adult can help you get the care you need without risking their freedom. If you’re in Idaho and you need assistance with an abortion, you can find your local Abortion Access Fund here. And if you don’t live in Idaho, please consider donating. AND:
STATE SEN. MEGAN HUNT POSING WITH PROTESTORS (PHOTO BY MEGAN HUNT)
![]() A 🍕 OF HISTORY"My Life I Give for the Freedom of My Country"It's Women's History Month. And every week, a Meteor collective member recounts a piece of women's history that resonates with them. Today, Shannon Melero unpacks the controversial legacy of freedom fighter Lolita Lebrón. ![]() LOLITA LEBRÓN AND TWO OTHER PUERTO RICAN NATIONALISTS AFTER HAVING BEEN ARRESTED BY CAPITOL POLICE ON MARCH 1, 1954. (PHOTO BY LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/CORBIS/VCG VIA GETTY IMAGES) The story of Lolita Lebrón was first described to me as a cautionary tale of a woman who inexplicably chose to become a terrorist. But as NPR’s Michelle Norris said about Lebrón in 2010, “One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter.” Lebrón was born in Lares, Puerto Rico—a place infamous because of an 1868 uprising against Spanish colonizers known as El Grito de Lares (“the scream of Lares”). The Spaniards violently quashed the uprising in a day and Lares is now considered the birthplace of Puerto Rican nationalism; this is the soil from which Lolita Lebrón sprung. Her teen years were also shaped by the Ponce massacre of 1937. By that time, Puerto Rico was no longer a Spanish colony but an American one, and peaceful demonstrators gathered that March 21—Palm Sunday—to protest the occupation. The U.S.-appointed governor of Puerto Rico, Blanton Winship, ordered local police to open fire on the group. They murdered 22 unarmed protestors and wounded more than 100 others. Like thousands of other islanders, Lebrón moved to the mainland in 1941, enticed by the promise of a better life. At the time, the U.S was looking to solve post-WWII labor shortages by importing cheap labor from a territory, while the Puerto Rican government acquiesced hoping that a population shift would alleviate the island’s crippling poverty. Several years after arriving in New York, she joined and then quickly rose in the ranks of the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party (no easy task for a woman at the time). At the same time, back at home, the United States was eliminating many of the islanders’ constitutional rights, including their ability to display the Puerto Rican flag, and Puerto Rico was officially declared a commonwealth of the U.S. It was because of this trampling of Puerto Rican sovereignty that wrongly imprisoned Nationalist Party leader Pedro Albizu Campos sent Lebrón a letter ordering an action against the U.S. government in Washington D.C. with the goal of drawing attention to the plight of Puerto Ricans. And she rose to the challenge. On March 1, 1954, Lebrón led three party members from New York City in an attack on the U.S. House of Representatives. The group entered the House armed, unfurled the Puerto Rican flag, and, as Lebrón shouted, “Viva Puerto Rico libre!”, fired into the chamber. Their stated goal, however, was not to commit murder—which is why Lebrón shot her first round into the ceiling. Five members of Congress were injured while trying to escape and Lebrón and her comrades were arrested, tried, and convicted. She was sentenced to 56 years in prison and served 25 before being pardoned by President Jimmy Carter in 1979. She stayed active in the fight for independence even after her release, and was arrested again at the age of 81 while protesting the American Navy’s presence in Vieques. Lebrón died in August 2010, an icon to millions. She never renounced her actions at the Capitol. To this day there are still debates about whether Lebrón was a lowlife criminal or a revolutionary pushed into action by the very real, very violent oppression that shaped her everyday life. Her legacy isn’t something that can be boiled down to the binary of “good woman” or “bad woman.” My hope is that when people think about this complex woman and her contributions to history they keep in mind the note she carried with her to the Capitol, where she believed she would be killed: “My life I give for the freedom of my country.” ![]() Shannon Melero is a Bronx-born writer on a mission to establish borough supremacy. She covers pop culture, religion, and sports as one of feminism’s final frontiers. FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
The Nashville shooter bought guns *legally*
![]() March 28, 2023 Happy Weed Appreciation Day, Meteor readers. (No, not that kind of weed—that’s another month away.) It’s not a light one today, as we mourn the loss of six more lives to the epidemic of gun violence—this time, in Nashville. But there are still good things in the world; for instance, our Women’s History spotlight celebrates Nicole Aunapu Mann, the first Native American woman to make it to space. But first: the news. Taking a moment of silence, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ON![]() ITEMS LEFT IN REMEMBRANCE AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE COVENANT SCHOOL, WHERE THE SHOOTING TOOK PLACE (PHOTO BY SETH HERALD/GETTY IMAGES) Tragedy in Nashville: Three children and three adults were killed in a shooting at a Nashville private school on Monday. The students killed were all nine years old; the adult victims included a custodian, a substitute teacher, and the school’s principal. The shooter, who has been identified as a former student of the school, was killed on the scene while firing on police. This marks the deadliest school shooting in America since the Uvalde attacks last May. Ashbey Beasley, a mother who survived the Highland Park shooting last summer, was visiting her sister in Nashville at the time of the shooting. She crashed a live Fox News broadcast Monday and emphasized the need for comprehensive gun reform, asking, “Aren’t you guys tired of covering this?” (If you haven’t watched, do.) And she’s right; after all, the shooter legally purchased a total of seven firearms, three of which were used during the shooting—meaning that the real subject to cover is our nation’s devastatingly lax gun laws. Unfortunately, all Gov. Bill Lee (who strongly opposes gun control) has to offer the victims is the usual: thoughts and prayers. And the congressman who represents the district where the shooting took place had his whole family pose with assault rifles for last year’s Christmas card. Typically when covering a shooting, it’s best not to give the shooter attention or glory. But a right-wing narrative has emerged that deserves addressing around the fact that the shooter may have identified as trans. A police spokesperson told the Washington Post that the killer was “a biological woman who, on a social media profile, used male pronouns.” Police said the shooter left a “manifesto” but have not given any indication whether it referenced their gender identity; that hasn’t stopped people from speculating. And it hasn’t stopped transphobes from spreading bullshit about how “the modern trans movement is radicalizing activists into terrorists.” There just isn’t enough information available at this time to know whether or not the shooter was trans, much less to justify a headline like “Transgender Killer Targets Christian School.” (We don’t label the usual killers as cis men, even though they almost always are.) What we do know is we’ve had over 100 mass shootings in America this year—and we’re not even a fourth of the way through. Let’s not let the pro-gun folks use “trans panic” to keep our attention off where it belongs: the reforms that will save lives now. If you or someone you know has been impacted by gun violence and you’re looking for help, you can start here. AND:
![]()
![]() A 🍕 OF HISTORYReach for the StarsIt's Women's History Month. And every week, a Meteor collective member recounts a piece of women's history that resonates with them. Today, Arvina Martin, executive director of Emerge Wisconsin, tells the story of Nicole Aunapu Mann, the first Native American woman in space. ![]() PHOTO BY NICOLE MANN HERSELF It can seem strange to think that there are still so many “firsts” left out there, but Nicole Aunapu Mann, a former Marine test pilot, achieved a pretty big one at the end of 2022. With a trip to space which lasted 157 days and included two spacewalks—she became the First Native American woman astronaut. Mann is an enrolled member of the Round Valley Indian Tribes, which is one federally recognized tribe with a reservation in Mendocino county, in northern California. The community is actually a confederation of six small tribes which were forced by settlers to live together in the mid-18th century, despite being distinctly different communities who spoke different languages. Mann is of the Wailaki people, one of the six, and grew up in nearby Sonoma County She told NPR last year that she hoped to inspire other young people like her: “These young women, maybe Natives, maybe people from different backgrounds, [may] realize that they have these opportunities and potentially these barriers that used to be there are starting to be broken down,” she said. Educated at the U.S. Naval Academy and Stanford, she pursued aviation, and was twice deployed aboard the USS Enterprise in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. By the time she was selected as an astronaut candidate in 2013—part of NASA’s 21st astronaut class—she had completed more than 2,500 flight hours in 25 types of aircraft; it took her two years to complete her training and another seven to be assigned to a space mission. When the SpaceX Dragon Crew launched on Oct. 5, 2022, Mann was at the helm as commander. In doing so,, she made history twice: Hers was the first SpaceX mission with a female commander as well as the first spaceflight with an Indigenous woman. She spent 157 days in space before returning to Earth on March 11. As both a woman and a Native American, she came home with so many firsts under her belt. But as a member of the Artemis team, she may still have another first coming: She may later become the first woman to walk on the moon. Arvina Martin is the Executive Director of Emerge Wisconsin. A member of the Ho-Chunk Nation, and Stockbridge-Munsee, she lives with her daughter and mother in Madison, Wisconsin, where she was the first Native American person ever elected to that city’s Common Council. ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
Join The Meteor and Dr. Jane Goodall in Brooklyn April 4
![]() March 22, 2023 Dear Meteor readers, We’re hosting a special evening in New York to kick off Earth Month—and we want to invite you to join us! On April 4, The Meteor and the Brooklyn Museum will welcome the one and only Dr. Jane Goodall, the ethologist and UN Messenger of Peace who is turning 89, to talk about her legacy and this crucial moment for our planet. ![]() PHOTO CREDIT: JGI/BILL WALLAUER Dr. Goodall, DBE, the founder of the Jane Goodall Institute, will be joined by young leaders and changemakers, including from her own Roots & Shoots youth program—people who are working on every aspect of our planet’s future, from oceans to climate change. And she’ll be in conversation with a special guest, to be announced soon. It’ll be a one-of-a-kind evening, presented by our friends at Commons, an app which helps you tackle the climate crisis. We hope you can join us! DETAILS:
The building and grounds, including parking, are wheelchair accessible. This program will include ASL interpretation. For further access needs, you can email [email protected]. See you soon, friends! The Meteor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
"Don't Say Gay" arrives abroad
![]() March 23, 2023 Ramadan Mubarak, Meteor readers, I hope everyone observing is able to find reflection, community, and anything else you seek. I’ve been re-reading these pieces on Ramadan from The Meteor’s Shannon Melero and Ayesha Johnson. If you missed them the first time, I highly recommend them now. In today’s newsletter, we look at Uganda’s latest draconian law criminalizing LGBTQ+ identity itself and how these cruel measures got their start. (Spoiler alert: It’s colonialism. It’s always colonialism.) Oh, and French scientists have announced that a small, vicious being indigenous to Corsica— you know, like Napoleon—is actually a unique (and adorable) species of cat-fox. Nous jurons allégeance! But first: the news. Booking a flight to Corsica, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONNo, really, do NOT say "gay": On Tuesday, with an overwhelming 387-2 majority, the Ugandan parliament passed a law making it illegal to identify as LGBTQ+. Uganda has a long history of oppressive measures like this; same-sex intercourse has been illegal since British colonial rule. But this new legislation bans anyone from even identifying as LGBTQ+ publicly, charging that claiming the identity is “promoting” it. The law also authorizes the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality,” a broad term covering many offenses—including having sex while HIV-positive. Speaker Anita Among congratulated the chamber, saying, “Whatever we are doing, we are doing it for the people of Uganda.” David Bahati, another lawmaker, claimed during debate, “Our creator God is happy [about] what is happening.” But according to Ugandan LGBTQ+ advocate Frank Mugisha, “The last time [anti-gay] legislation was around, there were cases of suicide…[and] this law is worse than the one that was here before.” This is the first law to explicitly ban identifying as LGBTQ+, but over 30 African countries have banned same-sex relations. Interestingly, though, if you go back a few centuries, many African countries (including Uganda) had a long history of embracing queerness—before British colonizers criminalized it and snuffed it out. And now, journalists point out, right-wing American groups have been picking up where the British left off. The Alliance Defending Freedom (which is also behind the lawsuit seeking to ban the abortion pill in the States…and those disingenuous “progressive Jesus” Super Bowl ads) has funneled over $100k into sponsoring anti-gay laws internationally; Focus on the Family has contributed over a million. So if anyone tries to paint the genocide of queer people as something happening “over there,” just remember: It starts here. You can support queer Ugandans trying to live their lives by donating here. AND:
![]() COME ON, LOOK AT THAT FACE! (PHOTO BY MARTIN BOONE) ![]() A 🍕 OF HISTORYCan We Pass the Equal Rights Amendment Already?It's Women's History Month. And every week, a Meteor collective member recounts a piece of women's history that resonates with them. Today, we remember the (still yet-to-be-passed) Equal Rights Amendment. ![]() (PHOTO BY ANN E. ZELLE/GETTY IMAGES) Yesterday marked the 51st anniversary of Congress passing the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which stated—concisely and, to our ear, perfectly—that “equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the Unites States or by any state on account of sex.” But after that remarkable vote, conservative activists rallied against the amendment and it failed to be ratified by a supermajority of the states in time for a Congressionally-imposed deadline of 1982. (The revocation of that deadline, which would allow for its ratification, is still pending in Congress.) Here, a young girl attends the 1978 ERA March in Washington, D.C., wearing white to honor the suffragettes who marched in the same city for the same cause 65 years earlier. Her sign—“not when I’m old”—probably sounded like a joke at the time, but she must be in her late 50s now. Let’s honor her wishes soon. ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
Why silencing women may come back to bite Trump
![]() March 21, 2023 Happy Nowruz, Meteor readers, I’m sure you’ve all been waiting all day to hear: Is Trump getting arrested on Tuesday? Short answer: No. But he could be indicted any day now. I’m gonna give myself arthritis with how tightly I’m crossing my fingers. In today’s newsletter, we’ve got Iranian activism, legislative ignorance, and the poetic justice of Trump potentially facing consequences from an attempt to silence women. In today’s slice of Women’s History, we’ve got yours truly telling you the tale of the late trans icon Christine Jorgensen, and what her story teaches us about the dangerous pressures to perform femininity. And finally: Another icon! The Meteor has just announced an April 4 event with Dr. Jane Goodall at the Brooklyn Museum. We can’t think of a better way to celebrate our planet. Get your tickets here while they last. But first: the news. Crossing my toes, Bailey Wayne Hundl ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONGrab him by the...handcuffs?: Former reality TV host and Twitter personality Donald Trump announced via social media Saturday that he expected to be arrested on Tuesday (he was not). The crime for which he could be indicted by a grand jury this week is the alleged falsification of business records to cover up hush money payments made starting in 2015 to at least two women—adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal. If he is, in fact, indicted by a grand jury, people close to him have said he wouldn’t even be expected to make a court appearance in the case until some time next week. Falsifying business records, the charge Trump potentially faces, is a misdemeanor under New York state law, unless they were falsified with the “intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof,” making them a Class E felony. Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, previously pleaded guilty to federal campaign finance violation charges for arranging the payments. It comes as a bit of a surprise that of all the things the man’s allegedly done—committing fraud, inciting violence, evading taxes, obstructing justice, assaulting, sparking a damn insurrection—this is the one that might result in actual criminal charges. But as satisfying as it’d be to see Trump held to task for all the horrible things he’s done, it’s almost poetic justice that he might actually face a jury of his peers for an attempt to bury a woman’s story about her own life. The same man we all watched deny a woman her opportunity to speak might now be punished for doing exactly that. And who can deny the sweet satisfaction of Trump being brought to (some modicum of) justice by a woman he called Horseface? AND:
![]() ![]() A 🍕 OF HISTORYThe Pressures of Performing FemininityIt's Women's History Month. And every week, a Meteor collective member recounts a piece of women's history that resonates with them. Today, Bailey Wayne Hundl examines the legacy of Christine Jorgensen, the first openly publicized trans woman in America. ![]() THE "BLONDE BEAUTY" HERSELF (PHOTO BY BETTMANN/GETTY IMAGES) On the front page of the December 1, 1952 edition of the New York Daily News, the headline read: “Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty: Operations Transform Bronx Youth.” The story on page three outed Christine Jorgensen, a trans woman who had traveled to Europe two years before and received gender-affirming hormones and surgery. Surprisingly, being outed did not ruin her life. Tons of news outlets picked her story up, emphasizing the same qualities the first story did: her (masculine) military background and transformation into perfectly performed femininity. She became, as trans people so frequently do, a public fascination. Jorgensen took the newfound attention and used it both to bring attention to LGBTQ+ people and to jump start a career in entertainment. She performed in nightclubs, spoke at colleges, wrote an autobiography, and even had a film written about her (in which she was played by a cisgender man). And though she was able to survive and thrive being publicly trans, it’s not lost on me that she was only able to do so because people were shocked by how well she “passed.” If she hadn’t been such a “blonde beauty,” it’s very unclear what options would have been available to her to pay the bills— especially after her public profile scuttled first her fiancé’s government career and their attempt to get married. Among other things, Jorgensen’s life and the media narrative around her serve as reminders that the societal standards for “appropriate femininity” are bullshit and that adherence to those standards can be, for some, a matter of survival. ![]() SPONSORED BY: ![]() We ❤️ NYC is a campaign to showcase the city’s strengths and mobilize New Yorkers. It focuses on what New Yorkers can do to support the post-pandemic resurgence of the city and its neighborhoods. It is also a celebration of New Yorkers who are already making a difference — the “doers” — and features opportunities for civic engagement. The We ❤️ NYC mark is a trademarked adaptation of Milton Glaser’s design for the “I ❤️ NY” campaign that launched in 1977. You can learn more at: www.welovenyc.nyc.
![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|