Women's soccer *is* That Bitch
![]() June 26, 2026 Greetings, Meteor readers, Last night, I went to a historic soccer match, so in today’s newsletter we’re going to relive that experience together and really appreciate what women are doing for the beautiful game. Plus, at some point, we’ll also talk news and have some brutal honesty about the U.S.’s relationship with ICE. But before we get to that stuff, a little announcement: Everyone’s been talking about the new film “The Invite,” a comedy about an awkward dinner party starring Olivia Wilde (who also directed it) and Penélope Cruz, and co-written by Rashida Jones. So let’s talk about it together! The Meteor will be gathering for a virtual “movie club” about “The Invite” on Monday, July 27th, at 1 pm. If you’ve seen it, join us—or go out and see it, then join us. (Not an ad, we’re just dying to talk to all of you again.) Click here to RSVP! Shannon Melero ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONIt’s good to be Queens: Under a blanket of Canadian wildfire smoke, with about 42,000 of my fellow soccer fans, I had the pleasure of sitting in Citi Field for the Queens Classic, a face-off between Gotham FC and the Washington Spirit. It was a far cry from the first professional women’s soccer game I ever attended in 2019, featuring the same two teams, on the Rutgers campus in Piscataway, New Jersey. On a relatively small soccer field, absent the many bells and whistles of a proper stadium, I watched national treasure Rose Lavelle and my woman-crush Caprice Dydasco speed across the grass and thought, Where the hell is everyone? Why were these women, some of whom had just gotten back from winning another World Cup, playing a venue where they didn’t even have a designated changing area? ![]() A SNAPSHOT OF THAT 2019 GAME, WHEN GOTHAM FC WAS INITIALLY NAMED SKY BLUE. LOOK VERY CLOSELY AT THE FAR END OF THE FIELD. THOSE ARE FANS SITTING ON BEACH CHAIRS THEY BROUGHT TO THE GAME. THAT'S DEDICATION. (COURTESY OF SHANNON MELERO) The Queens Classic was quite an upgrade from Piscataway (no shade). The sellout crowd was the largest audience gathered for women’s sports ever in New York, the first women’s sporting event ever held at Citi Field, and the second most-attended game in NWSL history. Gotham FC won the night with Lavelle scoring the only goal of the match. Superstar Sam Kerr also made her grand return to the NWSL, and when she took to the field, the crowd became unhinged. It wasn’t just a great game with great energy. It was a statement ringing through the smoke-filled air for all to hear: We have nothing left to prove. We the fans, we the league, we the players, we the writers dying to convince everyone that this is the place to be, have finally reached the promised land. The one where a massive event like last night’s can be held at the height of World Cup season—the same day as the semifinals—and still post record numbers. The place where you don’t have to justify being a women’s soccer fan, where you don’t have to utter the words See, it’s just as good as the men’s game—where, honestly, no one is even thinking about the MLS. The NWSL has shaken off the tiresome yoke of trying to be “just as good” and in a short 14 years become That Bitch. ![]() VERY DIFFERENT SEATING ARRANGEMENTS JUST A FEW YEARS LATER. (COURTESY OF SHANNON MELERO) Last night’s match was also designed to be an introduction of sorts. Gotham FC was originally formed in New Jersey and played its home games at Sports Illustrated Arena in Harrison, New Jersey. They are, however, considered an NJ/NY team, and earlier this month, the front office announced that Gotham would be making a permanent move to Queens’ Etihad Stadium in 2028. The response has been mixed. New Jersey loyalists don’t see themselves making the hour-plus-long journey to Queens for regular-season games, while New York fans blame New Jerseyans for not filling the seats at Sports Illustrated. (Just to be an angry fan for a moment, this team would not even be in Sports Illustrated if it weren’t for those of us who kept up the support in the no-win years!!! But now that our girls have two stars on that crest, you wanna take them away??!!) The stadium change is all anyone can talk about, so I shouldn’t have been surprised when the woman sitting next to me leaned over and asked, “So, what do you think about the move?” We went back and forth animatedly for a solid ten minutes about the risks and rewards of essentially abandoning an entire fan base in hopes of finding a better one in a more lucrative market. Between the two of us, we couldn’t come up with a firm answer. “Maybe there’s a new subway line coming that none of us know about,” my new pal mused. It seems that the only thing anyone can agree on is that the league is making a huge bet on itself—not just with this move into the most desirable sports market in the country but with a two-team expansion slated for the same year. The NWSL is finally moving like a woman who knows her worth, even if it means pissing off a couple hundred soccer moms in Central Jersey. You almost can’t be mad at it. AND:
![]()
![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
![]()
Don't sleep on this "attractive nice lady"
![]() July 14, 2026 Dearest Meteor readers, Word on the street is that cigarettes are back in vogue, a trend corroborated by their unusually strong presence among the guests at my birthday party last weekend. (I turn 42 tomorrow!) Pray for me and my commitment to nicotine gum, please. ![]() Today, we’re (re)introducing you to Dr. Annie Andrews, the Senate candidate who’s been pushed into the spotlight after Lindsey Graham’s death. Plus, a long-overdue payday for E. Jean Carroll. And, wash those greens! Keeping Nicorette in business, Nona Willis Aronowitz ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONAll eyes on Dr. Annie: So, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) died this weekend. His sudden demise makes it an excellent time to both review his horrendously anti-women, anti-LGBTQ+ record, and to take a closer look at the woman who had been vying for his seat: Dr. Annie Andrews, who would be the first pediatrician and woman doctor in the U.S. Senate if elected. We’ve had our eye on Andrews for a while, ever since she first announced her plans to run for Graham’s seat last spring. Clad in a white coat and stethoscope, she pointedly showed x-rays of children with measles pneumonia (“a condition easily prevented by vaccines”) and cancer (“one of the diseases the NIH doesn’t have the funding to study anymore”). South Carolina’s measles outbreak this winter only made the issue, and her background, more relevant. “I never in a million years, when I was in medical school, thought that I would be running for the U.S. Senate and also talking about measles nearly every single day,” Andrews told The 19th back in February. Graham had been dismissive of Andrews, telling reporters she was an “attractive nice lady with a couple of kids, but we don’t know what she believes in.” But Andrews has made it quite clear what she believes in (and FYI, she has three kids). “I believe that healthcare is a human right,” she told her supporters after winning her primary last month, and “that if you couldn’t pass a pop quiz about women’s reproductive anatomy, you shouldn’t have anything to do with writing laws about what a woman does with her own body.” She also called for impeaching and removing health secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.; fighting against Medicaid and Medicare cuts; fully funding the NIH and CDC, which have withered under RFK, Jr.’s tenure; and passing gun laws that protect kids. She’s the kind of candidate we desperately need more of, in an era of vaccine hesitancy and the rise of MAHA. ![]() THE LAB COAT IS A NICE TOUCH, TBH. (VIA YOUTUBE)All that said, Andrews was facing an uphill battle in a deep-red state where Graham won by double digits in 2020. But Graham’s death has scrambled the state’s election dynamics in a year that was already very, very bad for Republicans. Jalisa Washington-Price, a political strategist and senior advisor to the Harris-Walz campaign (and a South Carolina native), says that Andrews, who had already pulled closer to Graham in some polls, may have a chance in a year that has had little tolerance for “business as usual.” South Carolina and the region in general are experiencing a “political awakening,” she says, especially after the Supreme Court decision gutting the Voting Rights Act and the subsequent fight in South Carolina over a recent Trump-led redistricting effort (which eventually failed). South Carolina Republicans have also been attempting to further eviscerate reproductive rights with a law making its way through the state legislature that would explicitly sentence women who’ve had abortions to prison time. Andrews has been part of the pushback to that law, which she has called “barbaric” and part of an “anti-science, anti-family, anti-woman agenda.” “It's still South Carolina,” Washington-Price says, “but people are feeling really optimistic about her chances.” In the meantime, there’s also the question of who, exactly, Andrews will face in November: Graham’s sister, Darline Graham Nordone, has been appointed to fill his spot, but Washington-Price says it’s unlikely she’ll end up being Andrews’ challenger. She predicts that Republicans will pick a candidate who’s “Lindsey Graham-lite”—and that’s not, she says, what voters want. (Let’s hope for Andrews’ sanity that her challenger is not Nancy Mace, whose anti-trans crusade caused Andrews to leave her job as a doctor back in 2022.) Even if the electoral landscape has changed, Andrews is still staring down a huge challenge, both politically and tonally. It’s tough to campaign against the memory of a beloved person who just died. But Washington-Price doesn’t think Andrews will make any major pivots. Andrews confirmed as much to The New York Times yesterday: “The problems South Carolinians are facing,” she said, “have not changed over the weekend.” AND:
![]()
![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
![]()
Human Rights on the Ballot
![]() June 26, 2026 Greetings, Meteor readers, Lots of ground to cover today. First up, is abortion on the ballot in your state? We’re checking. Then, a quick news cruise before we ask television icon-turned-author Mara Brock Akil three questions about her new novel. Let’s hop to it, Shannon Melero ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONHuman rights on the ballot: We really cannot stop talking about just how important this year’s midterms are going to be. But don’t worry, this isn’t about the latest Democrat hotshot riding in on a white horse to save us—those are only fairytales. Instead, we’re taking a look at some crucial abortion-related ballot initiatives that may be flying under the radar given all the madness building up to November. So far, there are abortion measures on the ballot in Nevada, Missouri, and Virginia—all states that allow for abortion until viability (generally 21-24 weeks). In Nevada and Virginia, voters will get to decide on whether or not reproductive rights should also be enshrined in their states’ constitutions. In Missouri, Amendment 3 is on the table—voters will decide whether or not to repeal the constitutional right to reproductive freedom that voters approved in 2024 and prohibit all abortions except in emergency cases. Amendment 3 would also prohibit gender-affirming care for minors. It’s a double whammy of cruelty. Two other ballot measures are waiting for their respective secretaries of state's approval: an anti-choice one in Colorado that would void the newly added right to abortion in the state constitution, and a pro-choice one in Idaho to reverse the state’s extremely restrictive abortion ban. Before we go further, a side thought on abortion-related ballot initiatives. In a perfect world, if you ask us, basic healthcare and bodily autonomy wouldn’t even be up to voters. Other forms of medical care aren’t; we would balk if, say, cancer patients’ right to chemotherapy were up for debate. In a fundamental sense, it shouldn’t matter that abortion access is popular—it’s a human right, full stop. But given our current political reality, the fact that it is popular has been crucial—a key strategy for restoring and preserving reproductive freedom in a post-Dobbs world. (Which is why, after decades of pushing their own anti-choice measures, Republicans are now trying to make the process of ballot initiatives more onerous.) Back to what’s on deck for this fall: Ballot measures, especially constitutional amendments, are often written to intentionally confuse voters, so if you want to check if there are any measures in your specific state, click here. ![]() AND:
![]() ![]() Three Questions About…Black Women in the '90sBY REBECCA CARROLL ![]() (PHOTO BY EMMA FEIL) Most Black women who were trying to figure out their lives during the '90s know acclaimed TV writer and showrunner Mara Brock Akil for her shows like “Girlfriends” and “Being Mary Jane.” Younger ones may know her from her 2025 Netflix adaptation of the Judy Blume novel “Forever.” But now everyone will know her as an author. In her debut novel, The Revelation of Dionne Daphne, Akil brings us on a very '90s journey with magazine beauty editor Dionne, as she waits out the 14 days after taking an HIV test—no rapid tests, no internet, no iPhones. We had questions. Even though this novel takes place in the '90s, it also feels current. Why did you choose Dionne to tell this particular story? What I love about Dionne is that she is one of the early pioneers of living the American dream. She’s a character who would have been born with her full rights as a human being in this country, packed with the dreams of her mother and grandmothers. She knows her history; she’s educated, and so she feels ready to take on the world. But she can’t really launch forward until she turns around and faces her past. And during the '90s, we had this very looming disease, HIV, and taking that test, that two-week wait, was one of the necessary pauses that allowed you to literally reflect on the choices of your life while you waited for the result of your life. Dionne is a beauty editor at Essence. Why was it important for you to name a real magazine, along with its real longtime editor-in-chief, Susan L. Taylor? Essence was real for us. I remember it being almost like the holy grail of imaging for Black women and the spectrum of us. We could be all things in Essence. And the beauty that was reflected back—it wasn’t always celebrity-driven. [The models] were just these women, I didn’t know their names, and I saw myself in their image, style, and concerns. Essence was the place that was actually informing us because nobody else really cared about the issues that impacted us. The HIV story broke for Black women in Essence, when they started writing about the Down Low, and how it could affect us. That was a new conversation back in the '90s. And Susan Taylor led that. At one point in the book, Dionne says that silence has been both her protector and her oppressor. In this current political climate, people love to float this mantra of “Listen to Black women,” when in fact, right now, we are roundly being silenced. How has silence been both our protector and/or our oppressor as Black women in America? In some cases, the silence has been put upon us because no one values us or will listen, but that silencing has led us to write and read and look and examine. Black women are some of the most educated in this country, so yeah, you should be listening, but also we are carrying the weight [of that knowledge]. In our silence, we have used that time to really evaluate. The oppressing part is not finding ways for people to understand the complexity of us, and how we see the world, what the world has done to us, and how we have alchemized that as a way through. Breaking through the silence can be the thing that frees us as well. But in Dionne’s case, her silence was literally how she moved through life [after being sexually assaulted]. The silence helped her move through that dark period in her life, and reach for what the ‘90s was promising her. ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
![]()
Drop the Beer Goggles
![]() June 26, 2026 Salutations, Meteor readers, It comes as no surprise to anyone that the U.S. Men’s National Team has gone gently into that good night. They did their best, but alas, no one can outpace that presidential curse. Luckily for all of us, we’re only one year away from the superior team stepping onto the World Cup stage—the U.S. Women’s National Team. The ones who know how to score more than one goal. ![]() In today’s newsletter, Cindi Leive fumes about the ongoing obsession Democrats have with guys who peaked in high school. Plus, good news for the punks. Pricing flights to Brazil, Shannon Melero ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONHunter-and-halfback syndrome: By now, you’ve all read that yet another political candidate has been accused of sexual assault, in this case Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner of Maine, whose accuser is a woman who tells Politico that Platner raped her in her home. Platner is shedding endorsements by the second and, by the time you read this, may have dropped out, even though he has denied any wrongdoing. His implosion creates all kinds of headaches for Mainers hoping desperately to evict current Senator Susan Collins, a Republican who claims to be a moderate, sensible kinda gal, but in practice, often goes wherever the Trumpian winds are blowing, even when they blow all over our rights. There are a lot of questions we could ask about all this: Who else knew? Why didn’t Platner’s inner circle stop him from running? What made the candidate himself think he could go forward with a campaign with alleged violence in his past? But here’s the biggest one: Why did so many Democrats ignore so many mounting warning signs about Platner? The Nazi tattoo, the victim-blaming Reddit comments about rape, the sexting charges, and earlier this year, an entire New York Times investigation into his allegedly “unsettling dating life”—these were not subtle, one-off concerns. And yet, as Michelle Goldberg notes today, Platner’s campaign opted not to do the normal extensive background check, and no one apparently intervened to make it happen. One likely reason why? Platner fits an archetype that Democrats seem unable to resist: a white guy they wanna have a beer with. For some reason, Democrats are enamored—to the point of willful blindness—by men who fit this masculine, stereotypically all-American image. We love the athletes, oyster farmers, and soldiers so much that we lose our rational minds, skip the vetting process, and swoon. ![]() NEXT. (VIA GETTY)I get that impulse, for a million reasons. Trump doesn’t own masculinity, or the working class, or country music, and his policies hurt cis white guys in pickup trucks alongside the rest of us. So it is gratifying when veterans and football players push back on him. A Biker Dude standing up for immigrant rights gives the lie to what MAGA wants people to think—that real men want the old America. But Democrats need to stop overvaluing that stamp of approval, and doing cartwheels at the sight of every candidate who looks like an extra from "Friday Night Lights." And when we rush to anoint those men as the new face of the left—skipping the hoops we force women and Black and brown candidates to jump through—it also reeks of self-hatred on the left. Look, we’re not just the party of pronouns and Portlandia-scale political correctness; we have some hunters and halfbacks too! Radical thought: What would happen if it were just us? Aren’t we enough? The women, the Black and brown leaders, the immigrants? Are we so insecure about our reputation as snowflake intellectuals that we’ll throw caution to the wind for the first guy with a common touch? These are more than just hypothetical questions. The field of Democrats vying for the chance to run against Donald Trump in 2028 is crowded and will only get more so. Same for the House and Senate candidates who run this fall, and in 2028. So maybe instead of debating whether the highly experienced Black woman public servant should pull out of a race she hasn’t even entered yet, we should make sure we’re devoting the same scrutiny to these white dudes. Let’s make them, for once, earn our trust. —Cindi Leive AND:
![]() ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
![]()
Nikole Hannah-Jones on Reparations and Hope
![]() June 26, 2026 Greetings, Meteor readers, In today’s newsletter, Brittany Packnett Cunningham brings us a fascinating slice of American history from her conversation with journalist and Pulitzer Prize winner Nikole Hannah-Jones. Plus, a brief tour of the news before you kick off your long weekend. In a chair by a pool, Shannon Melero ![]() WHAT'S GOING ON![]() NIKOLE HANNAH-JONES AND BRITTANY PACKNETT CUNNINGHAM IN CONVERSATION AT VITAL VOICES HEADQUARTERS IN WASHINGTON, D.C. (PHOTO BY PURE BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY) Last week, I got a chance to interview Nikole Hannah-Jones, the Pulitzer Prize-winning creator of The 1619 Project, about reparations, as we get ready for America's 250th birthday party. (And y'all know how I feel about that birthday party.) But here's what really stuck with me. She talked about the optimism that's hard for her to hold on to…except for when she thinks about Frederick Douglass. She spoke about his powerful rebuke, “What to the Slave is the 4th of July,” which he delivered mere months before emancipation, not knowing how much his words would help open up a pathway that people had been fighting for for years. It also makes me think of his first wife, Anna Murray Douglass, who often gets left out of the story, as Black women so often do. Anna was born a free Black woman. It was the work of Anna's hands, sewing and creating for wealthy white families, that gave Frederick Douglass the funds to escape enslavement. She bore their five children, ran their home, and even turned it into a stop on the underground railroad while Frederick Douglass was traveling the country preaching abolition. My friend Stevie Elem Rogers is constantly reminding us that whenever we speak about Frederick Douglass, we always need to speak Anna Murray Douglass’ name. Her and Frederick's work, and Nikole’s words, remind me that no matter how impossible it seems, freedom is always on the horizon if we just keep working… and we just keep walking. Here’s an excerpt from our conversation, which you can listen to in full here. — Brittany Packnett Cunningham Nikole Hannah-Jones: Since we are right at the cusp of celebrating the 250th anniversary of the “founding” of this nation, I want to remind us of what we come from—what we're made of. Because even as hopeless as I often feel, I know I come from a people who had to believe that the impossible could be made manifest. My entire life…is a product of hope beyond despair. In 1852, Frederick Douglass gets asked to deliver his famous oratory, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” Now, this is 1852. Frederick Douglass is a fugitive from slavery. He is on the run, and yet he is out fighting the abolitionist cause in public and advertising where he's gonna be. If you know the story, he refuses to give the speech on the Fourth of July because he is offended. Like, how dare you ask me to come talk about your independence when four million of my people are in the worst bondage in the history of the world? So he gives the speech [on July 5th], and 13 years later, slavery will fall. Now, there would be no reason, no historical reason, no logical reason, to believe in 1852 that slavery could fall in 13 years. We were almost at the height of slavery in the United States, and yet it did. And he had to believe, and all of the abolitionists who fought had to believe, that it could happen, for it to happen. ![]() DOUGLASS CIRCA 1877 (VIA GETTY IMAGES) So while I don't know if we will see reparations in our lifetime or not, the very first person to get reparations was Belinda Sutton in the 1780s when she sued her former master. The very first person to technically get what we call actual reparations [in the form of a lump sum payment rather than an annual pension] was a woman named Henrietta Woods, who sued her former master for recapturing her and selling her back into slavery, and she won that suit in 1870. Callie House was fighting for reparations—for an ex-slave pension for all of those who spent their whole life working for free—and she was arrested for that. She ended up serving federal time for the audacity to call for reparations. So Black folks have been asking for reparations for almost as long as slavery existed. Most of us never got them, but that doesn't mean that we never will. So we do have to believe. We do know that we come from people who believe the impossible could be made manifest. On my dark days, I'm like, "Never." But on my brighter days, I know it's possible. And I know if anybody can do it, it's us. This conversation was recorded at Vital Voices Global Headquarters in Washington, D.C. For more from The Meteor’s ongoing look at reparations this summer, check out this episode of UNDISTRACTED with guest Adam Serwer and watch the full video of the Nikole Hannah-Jones conversation on YouTube, featuring Aria Florant of Liberation Ventures. AND IN OTHER NEWS:
That's all for us, catch you next week. ![]() ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
![]()
25 Moments We Glimpsed the Promise of America
It’s easy to view the celebration of America’s 250th birthday with cynicism, given the current way our old girl is behaving. But we don’t want to give in to that. Instead, we’re celebrating moments when the American experiment worked—when people (often women) pushed, pulled, persuaded and otherwise laid the stepping stones for a better and more inclusive future. The list isn’t comprehensive; it’s random in what we hope is the best possible way.
When Women Kept the Revolution Going (1776-1796)
Women were an unsung part of the Revolutionary War, from participating in the homespun movement to becoming “camp followers” who kept soldiers in food, clothes, and supplies. But the women of the Catawba Nation did something extraordinary: They supported the Patriots with food and goodwill, and they helped preserve their own culture in the face of encroaching European settlers (on the land of what is now South Carolina). Shortly after the war, Sarii (also known as Sally New River) secured more than 500 acres of her people’s land to ensure the survival of the Catawba people.
When Women Gathered for Abolition (1837)
At the 1833 convention establishing the American Anti-Slavery Society, abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison recognized the work of smaller anti-slavery women’s groups and urged them to form “female auxiliaries.” They did more than that. In 1837 in New York, 71 women delegates gathered for the “unprecedented” Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women. During the convention, abolitionist Angelina Grimké wrote a resolution that said it was “the duty of woman, and the province of woman… to do all that she can by her voice, and her pen, and her purse, and the influence of her example, to overthrow the horrible system of American slavery.”
When the “Dangerous Experiment” of Women’s Education Began (1830s-1890s)

For years, women had been barred from higher education in the newly formed U.S. But in the mid-19th century, pioneers like Mary Lyon founded “female seminaries” like Mount Holyoke and Wheaton Female Seminary (now Wheaton College). More women’s colleges followed, eventually forming the Seven Sisters. In 1881, Spelman, a college for Black women born in a church basement in Atlanta, opened its doors. At the time, naysayers deemed higher education for women a “dangerous experiment,” claiming that serious study might cause women to “lose their innocence and virtue.” Meanwhile, women with college degrees became lawyers and doctors and scientists and scholars, forever broadening the scope of what was possible for American women.
When Eunice Foote Figured Out Global Warming (1856)
In 1856, as the Industrial Revolution swept across the U.S., an amateur scientist and women’s rights campaigner from upstate New York conducted groundbreaking research showing that carbon dioxide could trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere. Eunice Newton Foote’s results were published in the American Journal of Science and Arts, but she was barred from reading her paper aloud, and credit for “discovering” the process of global warming would go to Irish scientist John Tyndall three years later. Today, we understand Foote (who’d studied science thanks to educators who believed in equal rights) as “the mother of climate science.”
When Black Freedom Showed Us America’s Potential (1865 - 1877)
The overarching white public view prior to Reconstruction was that Black people didn’t have the capacity or the intelligence to engage in public life. But after the Civil Rights Act of 1866, Black people proceeded to take their citizenship and do every single last thing white people said they couldn’t do or be. An estimated 2000 held public office, shaping state and federal policies; others built schools, established church congregations, and cultivated strong, healthy communities. The backlash, in the form of Jim Crow, was swift and fierce and would last for nearly 100 years—but the period of Reconstruction showed what America could do and be as a country.
When the “Suffrage State” Earned Its Name (1869)

Decades before the 19th Amendment would pass in 1919, the then-territory of Wyoming (which was looking to attract more women) granted women full voting rights, along with the ability to hold office, sit on a jury, and have property rights separate from their husbands. When Wyoming began the process of becoming a state decades later, the U.S. Congress threatened to withhold statehood if women continued to have the vote. The Wyoming legislature sent a telegram saying it would rather not become a state at all than rescind the voting rights of women. Wyoming joined the U.S. formally in 1890 with women’s voting rights intact.
When the “Working Girls” Rose Up (1909)
“I am a working girl, one of those who are on strike against intolerable conditions,” 19-year-old garment worker Clara Lemlich declared in Yiddish at a labor meeting in November 1909. “I offer a resolution that a general strike be declared now.” In the days following, tens of thousands of garment workers, most of them young immigrant women, walked off the job to demand safer working conditions. The strike wasn’t wholly successful—the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory resisted reforms, with infamous and tragic results—but Lemlich’s “uprising of 20,000” proved to sexist labor unions that women could lead massive, effective strikes.
When a Black Chemist Changed Medicine (1915)

Before antibiotics were invented, leprosy was a scourge that ruined lives—and the only known treatment, oil from the chaulmoogra tree, made patients nauseous when swallowed and was too thick to be injected. Enter the Ball Method, named after Alice Ball, a 23-year-old Black chemist at the College of Hawai’i who figured out how to modify chaulmoogra oil to be water-soluble. The treatment killed bacteria and freed people from leper colonies; as for Ball, two men at her university took credit for her work after she died suddenly, but decades later, other Black chemists like Sibrina Collins made sure Ball got her due.
When Two Women Became Governors (1924)
Fresh off the 19th Amendment, the 1924 election led to both the first and second women governors in America: Nellie Tayloe Ross of Wyoming and Miriam “Ma” Ferguson of Texas. Both were succeeding their husbands, and Ferguson had even been against women’s suffrage in the past—but their elections made it clear that women’s political power was starting to grow.
When Federally Funded Childcare Was Real (1943 - 1946)
If you’ve ever wondered who took care of Rosie the Riveter’s kids, the answer is the government: From 1943 to 1946, the Lanham Act funded federally subsidized childcare for more than half a million children. First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, a major supporter of the program, described the centers as “a need which was constantly with us, but one that we had neglected to face in the past.” We’re still neglecting that need, but at least we have proof that universal childcare can work.
When We Had a League of Our Own (1943 - 1954)

You’ve seen the movie; you’ve quoted the lines, but the real All-American Girls Professional Baseball League was one of the first true tests of how successful women’s leagues could be. Even after World War II ended, the league continued and brought almost one million people into ballparks to watch women play ball until its closure in 1954. Over those twelve seasons, 600 women from the U.S., Cuba, and Canada played across 10 teams, paving the way for millions of sportswomen to come.
When Gender-Affirming Care Came Stateside (1966)
In November 1966, Johns Hopkins University, led by Dr. Milton Edgerton, opened the U.S.’s first clinic aimed at addressing the needs of the transgender community by offering the gender-affirming surgeries that were at the time more common in Europe. Before opening the clinic, doctors at Johns Hopkins performed the first known “sexual reassignment” surgery on U.S. soil in February of 1965.
When Trash Changed Everything (1969)

Sometimes grassroots movements don’t involve anything as lovely as grass. When the city of New York refused to grant the residents of East Harlem a consistent garbage pick-up schedule, leaving them to endure sweltering summer heat surrounded by waste, the Young Lords took matters into their own hands. For a month, Young Lords would sweep their neighborhood sidewalks, collect the trash, and deposit it in the middle of busy streets used by suburban commuters to block traffic. This went on for 38 days, but in the end, the Department of Sanitation was forced to make changes, some of which are still in effect today, like alternate-side street sweeping.
When Survivors Held the First Rape Conference (1971)
Before Second Wave feminism, rape was a personal, private misfortune. That changed with consciousness-raising sessions held in living rooms across the country, and later at the first rape speakout in 1971, hosted by New York Radical Women, at which survivors began speaking openly about being raped—not just by violent strangers but also by friends, neighbors, colleagues. A few months after the speakout, NYRW held the nation’s first conference on rape, which established the modern paradigm of sexual assault as a social and political problem, not an individual tragedy, and a male expression of control over women—laying the groundwork for every anti-rape movement since.
When Abortion Access Had a “Honeymoon Period” (1973 - 1976)
The three years after the Supreme Court granted the constitutional right to abortion in 1973, before access was restricted by the Hyde Amendment in 1976, were a kind of honeymoon period for abortion history. Just a year after Roe, there were already more than two thousand facilities performing safe, legal abortions in the United States. Access still lagged among poor and rural women, as well as teenagers, but those early years were “a very proud, happy time,” Dr. Suzanne T. Poppema, one of the first legal abortion providers, recalled in 2015.
When Laws Finally Started to Catch Up With Our Lives (1970s)
If you need a reminder that change is possible and not always glacial, consider the 1970s. Buoyed by rising feminism globally and the victories of the civil rights movement domestically, women pushed for and won protections against educational inequality, pregnancy discrimination, housing discrimination, sexual harassment, and other obstacles that had been so ingrained as to be invisible. And in 1977, 20,000 women convened at the National Women’s Conference in Houston, drawing a bold plan of action for future work. “Women are human,” said Rep. Barbara Jordan in her keynote speech. “When our rights are limited or violated, a domestic human rights effort is required.”
When Disability Activists Took on Nixon (1973)
After President Nixon vetoed the Rehabilitation Act of 1972, which would have helped to improve the lives of disabled people suffering from kidney ailments, as well as provided medical centers for deaf and blind people, activist Judith Heumann had questions. Specifically: “Where is Nixon’s headquarters?” In response to Nixon’s veto, Heumann and the group Disabled in Action (DIA) organized a demonstration in New York City with about 50 other disability activists, mostly in wheelchairs, who shut down the streets that surrounded Nixon’s re-election campaign headquarters in New York on Madison Avenue. Ultimately, Nixon went on to sign the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which became the first federal legislation to protect the rights of disabled people—and Heumann went on to lead the fight for the breakthrough Americans with Disabilities Act two decades later.
When the Cherokee Nation Elected a Woman (1987)
Native American women had historically helped lead their communities, but the “trickle-down patriarchy” brought by settlers had changed that. Then, in the 1970s, the Cherokee Nation voted to allow chiefs to be elected popularly, rather than be appointed by the US president, and in 1987, Wilma Mankiller became the first woman chief elected to lead the Cherokee (and in fact, any Native tribe in modern times). She expanded health care and child services to Native communities and emphasized, always, “that we have indigenous solutions to our problems.”
When All We Do is Win (1991)
They say winning isn’t everything—it’s the only thing. In 1991, after 61 years of men’s tournaments, FIFA put together the first Women’s World Cup in Guangzhou, China. April Heinrichs led the U.S. women to victory against the Netherlands. This win would be instrumental in growing the professional women’s game in America…and helping lay the groundwork for women’s pro sports overall.
When the Cajuns Came Sailing In (2005)
The greatest tragedies often reveal the strongest spirits. When Hurricane Katrina ravaged Louisiana, and residents were largely abandoned by FEMA, their fellow citizens stepped in to form the Cajun Navy, a volunteer search and rescue team comprised of fishermen and boat owners who answered the call. It’s estimated that the Cajun Navy saved the lives of at least 10,000 hurricane victims.
When the First Family Was Cool (2008- 2016)

It wasn’t just that the Obamas were the first Black presidential family in the White House; it was that they brought a whole entire vibe with them. Their presence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C. was, among many other things, about four exemplary humans who truly wanted the best for each other, and for all Americans. And their best meant celebrating and championing Black artistry in a way that made Blackness feel synonymous with being American. Always humble, completely focused, the Obamas showed Americans that public service can be joyous, and that democracy is for everyone.
When We All Said #metoo (2017)
It started in October 2017, with a pair of explosive exposés about Harvey Weinstein’s decades-long pattern of sexual abuse, and blossomed into a full-blown movement that built on the work of me.too founder Tarana Burke from years earlier to raise awareness about the ubiquity of sexual assault. That fall—before the backlash, before the comebacks—was a watershed moment that not only led to important legislative victories, but attacked a culture of silence surrounding sexual abuse and harassment.
When They Put the Super in Super Bowl (2025, 2026)

We’re all still recovering (in a good way) from how hard the critique of American exploitation and imperialism slapped in Kendrick Lamar’s and Bad Bunny’s halftime Super Bowl performances in 2025 and 2026, respectively. Lamar came with “the Big Game” as a symbol of America’s systemic inequality, and Bad Bunny gave us a diasporic message that doubled down on the meaning of hemispheric unity. The way they both took a stage that is so hyper-capitalist, ostensibly the very essence of “Americana,” and, along with the visionary talents of choreographer Charm La’Donna, turned it into a platform for nuanced, radical freedom of expression is a blueprint we want for America.
When We Kept a Promise (June 2026)

After the Trump administration tried to undermine the 14th Amendment granting birthright citizenship to all children born on U.S. soil regardless of their parents’ status, ACLU lawyer Cecillia Wang rose to the challenge of defending birthright citizenship before the Supreme Court. Wang, herself a birthright citizen, argued the case of Trump v. Barbara and won in a 6-3 ruling. The Court stated that the 14th Amendment offered the “right to have rights” to any “free-born person on this land,” and concluded, “We keep that promise today.”
The Power of "I deserve this"
![]() June 26, 2026 Greetings, Meteor readers, I cannot get enough of the national drama unfolding over our jacked-up Reflecting Pool. PoolTok has been simply impeccable. Today, sports journalist Jemele Hill explains the beauty of the World Cup and the boldness of the WNBA. Plus, is Hot Socialist Summer coming to a city near you? ![]() Please let the vandals be real, Nona Willis Aronowitz ![]() WHAT'S GOING ON“You gonna learn to like it”: It’s been an amazing year in sports—and no, we don’t mean the Knicks in what we refer to around here as the MNBA. Over in the WNBA, the women are having a superstar season. And that’s to say nothing of how even non-soccer fans are getting into the World Cup spirit this year. So this week, Brittany Packnett Cunningham invited her friend, sports journalist Jemele Hill, onto UNDISTRACTED to unpack it all. Some highlights: Brittany Packet Cunningham: The Men’s World Cup—the MWC, we’ll call it—is taking over America. The fever is rich. But when we talk about this intersection of sports and politics, ICE has refused to stay away from the World Cup host cities. What do we know about what's actually happening? Jemele Hill: I'm gonna say this. Despite the shadow [cast by] our current administration…what I have been inspired by this World Cup is that the visitors that are here are seeing that there's a big difference between the government and the people, in terms of how these fans are being accepted in American cities. Frankly it's been tickling me—I would love to know what their cholesterol gonna be when they leave here, ‘cause it's gonna be bad. Waffle House, Cracker Barrel, they been all up in Golden Corral. [Laughs.] That to me has cleaned up the stench of how this administration feels about visitors. I think this World Cup overall has been beautiful because of how these visitors are experiencing America, and understanding we are not defined by the ugliness of Donald Trump. BPC: [In March] the WNBA negotiated a huge new deal for themselves. They got a massive pay increase for this season, and increased their overall earnings fivefold. It was a victory that splashed into the popular zeitgeist. Talk a little bit about why this is a big deal. JH: This is huge. [The WNBA] was my first professional beat, and I think about where they were in 1997. It was a 28-game season…and as part of the new CBA they will be playing 50 games next season, which is incredible. The pay and salary increases are staggering and gigantic. And I know that it's really easy to compare to the MNBA, but the comparison that should be made is where the MNBA was after [just] 30 years…Like, they were in serious financial trouble. The WNBA has certainly gone through some ups and downs. That's normal for a league as it's trying to build its foundation. But let me tell you—the WNBA has lapped the field to where the men were after 30 years. ![]() OLIVIA MILES BEING HER AUTHENTIC SELF AGAINST THE WASHINGTON MYSTICS. (VIA GETTY)BPC: Now you tune into an WNBA game and you see Sephora seat covers. Angel Reese has a gajillion endorsements. It's clear that the women of the league have been very creative in building their own lanes, but I'm curious: Do you think the CBA helped the brands get clear on just how bankable these players are? JH: With the WNBA, it was already growing. But then the explosion happened because you had Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese in the league at the same time. Sometimes you need a lightning strike, and the lightning strike happened. Where the league used to try to capitulate to a certain image of what they wanted these women to be, now it’s not that way anymore. You got your Barbies, you got your studs, you got every manner of women. You even look at the promising amazing rookie right now, Olivia Miles, she out there, full-blown Afro, serving buckets and being her authentic self as she does it. These women were like, “You gonna learn to like it.” That was their approach, and the brands have followed…[The players] had to force themselves to be seen. That's not easy to do, especially if you're talking about a league that is dominated by Black women and queer women. BPC: The WNBA has also been one of the few places in society where really visible women, especially Black and queer women, have been vocally against Trump's agenda. You got Liberty players wearing Kamala Harris shirts. You got Dream players who endorsed Raphael Warnock, even though his opponent, Kelly Loeffler, was a co-owner of the team. Why do you think that boldness exists [in the WNBA] so uniquely? JH: The boldness exists because most of the women that are in the league have constantly had to fight for dignity and respect…I'm sure a lot of them remember the indignities they had to suffer…[having to] prove over and over again, I'm just as good as you, or I belong just like you belong. So when you're in that mode, it's natural for you to fight. It's natural for you to say, “I deserve this.” When they put themselves on the line for Raphael Warnock against another WNBA owner [in 2020], they weren't making any money. If anything, they should be the ones trying to protect their little crumbs. It kind of shamed the men because it's like you sitting on millions of dollars and you ain't doing nothing. What’s your excuse? This interview has been condensed and edited. Listen to the whole episode here. AND:
![]() D.C. MAYORAL CANDIDATE JANEESE LEWIS GEORGE BROUGHT HER SON WITH HER TO VOTE THIS MONTH. (VIA GETTY)
![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
![]()
Is your landlord a robot?
![]() June 23, 2026 Salutations, Meteor readers, Mmmyyyyy president is a Love Island: USA fan. I don’t know about y'all's president. In today’s newsletter, we’ve got your first look at a new study about race, wealth, and AI. Plus, it’s been four years since the Dobbs decision, and we’re writing a love letter to the people who deserve it (not Samuel Alito). P.S. New York readers! You still have time to get to the polls and do your thing. ![]() From the villa, Shannon Melero ![]() WHAT'S GOING ONIs your landlord a robot: In the short time that generative AI has been the center of national conversation, it’s been cast as one of two things: the harbinger of the end of the human race, or the greatest thing to happen to us since the Industrial Revolution. However, there is a third, less dramatic path that AI has been quietly taking: maintaining the status quo. Today, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights released a new qualitative report revealing that the use of generative AI, specifically in housing and employment, has been compounding existing biases against people of color. If left unchecked, the researchers posit, the use of AI will widen the existing racial wealth gap in the United States. (The report focuses primarily on the gap between white and Black Americans because it is “the most measurable and well-documented.”) The most concerning findings address the increasing use of AI in the housing market—aka “proptech,” short for property technology—to do everything from screen tenant applications to determine mortgage access. These tools “systemically reproduce racial disparities” because the algorithms are relying on existing biased data (like redlining and other kinds of de jure segregation), the report explains. The algorithms also lack an understanding of nuance: “Screening tools fail to consider mitigating factors such as job loss, medical hardship, domestic violence, or the actual outcomes of prior eviction cases.” And the group bearing the brunt of proptech’s algorithmic discrimination is Black women, who were already overrepresented in the growing eviction crisis; AI bias, the research shows, will only worsen the problem. “It’s not because Black women aren’t paying rent,” explains Yvette N. A. Pappoe, a litigator and equity scholar who is one of the authors of the report. “Evictions happen for all kinds of reasons that have nothing to do with paying rent. But that doesn’t matter to the algorithm.” Pappoe explains that unlike a human reviewing an application, AI is not “checking to see if an eviction was dismissed. It’s not checking to see if paperwork was misfiled.” It’s simply pulling an eviction record and disqualifying candidates based on a singular negative metric. The report points to the example of a woman named Mary Louis, who was denied an apartment after a program called SafeRent rated her poorly due to bad credit. The program did not take into account other mitigating factors such as Louis’ housing voucher, a high-credit co-signer, and a letter of recommendation from her previous landlord. Louis and 400 other Black and Latino applicants filed a lawsuit against SafeRent last year. “People have talked about AI as this equalizing force…that can be used to help democratize access,” Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of the Center for Civil Rights and Technology, tells The Meteor. And some of that is true: “It's increasing information. It's making our lives easier in all of these ways.” But these good things will only happen, Montoya-Boyer says, “if we have the guardrails in place to…make sure that this technology is developed [in a way that recognizes] the vast history of racism and sexism, and discrimination that is built into our society. Without guardrails, AI is just going to replicate all of that.” “One of the key guardrails we suggest is a requirement on having a human in the loop,” says Montoya-Boyer. “Companies absolutely should not be using AI tools for consequential decision-making without human oversight.” While much of the study highlights the failings of AI in housing and employment, it’s not anti-AI, per se–especially for women or people of color. From an AI literacy standpoint, it “makes sense for us as people from marginalized communities…to be engaging” with these tools, Montoya-Boyer says. “But the onus of responsibility should not be [solely on consumers].” Overall, the researchers are operating with a sensibility that almost resembles optimism. “One thing the report tries to do is point to a world where we flip what’s happening…where AI is incorporated in such a way that it helps to shrink the wealth gap,” Pappoe explains. In that world, AI could help expand access to wealth accumulation and affordable housing, as well as democratize banking and credit for historically excluded communities. As Pappoe puts it: “We’re not totally doomed.” AND:
![]() LILY SHANNON (L) CELEBRATES WITH LILY YOVETICH (R) AFTER THEIR NORTHERN HUSKIES CAME OUT ON TOP AT THE 2025 WOMEN'S BEANPOT TOURNAMENT CHAMPIONSHIP IN BOSTON. (VIA GETTY IMAGES)
![]() ONE MORE THINGTomorrow, it will have been exactly four years since the Supreme Court ruled that American women had no constitutional right to abortion. That decision ushered in a bloody era of violence, of women dying in bed, in the ER, while their mothers screamed, while their children screamed. It has been an era of mounting shamelessness on the part of extremist lawmakers who have stopped even feigning concern and instead hired bounty hunters, gone after doctors, spread outlandish lies, and suggested executing abortion patients. It has been as bad as abortion-rights advocates said it would be, and they said it would be very, very bad. So it would be easy to end this newsletter thinking about all the outrages, about all the self-important men (most of them white) making decisions about the lives and deaths of women (many of them Black). But we’ve been doing that, and you’ve been doing that, for years now. This, instead, is a love letter. To the volunteers who have spent the last four years doing midnight shifts at abortion funds, answering terrified calls from Florida or Texas. To the medical personnel who ship abortion pills to people in ban states; who are nimble with their regimens as mifepristone is under threat; who refer their clients to out-of-state providers in hushed tones; who protect their patients from ceaseless harassment; who train students and open clinics on the borders of abortion-hostile states. To the advocates who make it easier to get abortion pills. To the lawyers who file suit after suit. To the organizers who knock on thousands of doors to get abortion referendums on the ballot, where they matter. To the journalists who tell the truth even when state officials won’t. To the pilots, to the drivers, to the parents. And to the women who have told their stories, over and over and over and over. The news cycle has somewhat moved on from abortion bans. These people never did. They have taken care of you, and of each other, and they’re only getting stronger. Tomorrow isn’t about the assholes. It’s about them, and us. Tomorrow is also a great day to give to an abortion fund. Find one near you here. – Cindi Leive ![]() FOLLOW THE METEOR Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend?
|
![]()
The Perfect Juneteenth Party
Six Black women describe what freedom feels like
By Rebecca Carroll
Juneteenth belongs to Blackness. Whatever we might know about it as a newly declared national holiday, commemorating the date when enslaved people were free to become citizens and keep their families intact, it is the Blackness of this day in history that reverberates most. And at its core, Blackness will always be about imagining life and joy into existence.
We asked a handful of Black women we admire to describe what a perfect Juneteenth celebration would look like.

My ideal Juneteenth is…
“Fully experiencing pure joy”
My beautiful grandmother, Caressa, was part of the Great Migration. She moved up north around 1924, and built a life for herself on Long Island. After church on Sundays, she’d drive into Harlem just to people-watch. She loved the sharp outfits, the fancy cars, the laughs and greetings exchanged on crowded sidewalks— a “Good day!” here, an "Alright now!" there.
My perfect Juneteenth would bring her, my great-aunt Carrie-Bell, my sister, and generations of maternal ancestors to New Orleans. We’d spend the day on the porch of a grand old Esplanade Avenue home in rocking chairs, nestled among lush plants, iced tea in hand, watching the world go by just as my grandmother once did in Harlem.
The streets would be alive with music, color, laughter and possibility. We’d watch people in what I like to call their “gadabout season”—talking, eating, dancing, joyful in every step. At some point, Aunt Carrie-Bell would remind us to “keep the doors open,” and we’d do just that: remain open to one another, open to joy, open to possibility. A reminder, or perhaps a demand, to move through the world with a softness and freedom.
Finally, generations of Black women with nothing to carry. That’s my ideal Juneteenth.
—Brandee Younger, harpist, composer and educator

My ideal Juneteenth is…
An atmosphere pulsing with hope and possibility
The year before Juneteenth became a national holiday, I celebrated June 19th in Oakland, California, where I moved from San Francisco in 2020. My husband, an attorney for more than 25 years at that point, was getting restless. He took the same bus to and from work every day, ate at the same lunch spots, saw the same people. “I want to do something different,” he said. “I need to switch things up.” At the same time, we’d both noticed how much San Francisco had changed. Too many tech bros. Too much traffic. So many creative people had been priced out of the city. But worst of all, San Francisco’s Black population had dwindled to less than five percent. The place felt sterile and homogenous, void of culture and flavor.
For years, we’d heard folks rave about Oakland. “Oakland is cool,” they’d say. “Oakland is creative.” Our last child had gone off to college and we were empty nesters, suddenly free to move wherever we chose. So when my husband pitched the idea of moving across the bridge, I agreed.
Oakland pulled out all the stops when Juneteenth became a federal holiday in 2021. Thousands of people came out to celebrate, gathering around Lake Merritt, the Oakland’s version of Central Park, to picnic and barbecue in the grass. From the tents set up along the sidewalk, merchants peddled Louisiana hot links and vegan soul food, roasted coffee, handmade jewelry and bolts of African mud cloth.
People roller-skated and line-danced. A Black equestrian club paraded their horses down the middle of the street. The air was spiced with incense and weed. The atmosphere pulsed with hope and possibility. The vibe was relaxed and easy. The mood, one of unbridled joy, Black pride, love and community.
Everyone was your cousin. Everyone was family. I don’t have to imagine my perfect Juneteenth because that day, I experienced it.
—Natalie Baszile, Author of Queen Sugar, and Friends and Family

My ideal Juneteenth is…
Drinking red Kool-Aid on sacred ground
I imagine my perfect Juneteenth celebration taking place in eastern Maryland, my home state. I’m in Dorchester County to be exact, Harriet Tubman’s place of birth and where she first imagined freedom—stubbornly, prophetically, and communally. This is sacred ground. On the side of the Harriet Tubman Museum and Educational Center in Cambridge, Maryland, there is a beautiful and periodically-viral mural that depicts Ms. Harriet with her hand outstretched to catch us, hold us, and guide us across time and tribulations. I can see a joyous group of Black people gathered there to honor her vision for us all to be free and whole. We are dancing, singing, laughing, and playing as we drink red Kool-Aid on sacred ground. Because trouble don’t last always. Ashe.
—Kemi Ilesanmi, diaspora arts builder
My ideal Juneteenth is…
A day filled with flowers, rich history, and loved ones
My ideal Juneteenth celebration is centered on food and fellowship. I’m welcoming friends and family, and we’ve chosen a theme for the day (because no Black family gathering is complete without a theme!) We’d select a vibrant color that would reflect both pride and celebration. Our favorite songs are playing all day, and I’ve decorated the house with fresh flowers inspired by the incredible flower wagons that were once part of historic Juneteenth parades.
I love to cook, so I’d have fun prepping the recipes passed down through generations: the meat for barbecue and fried fish, then getting to work carefully washing fresh collards, frying cabbage, and peeling potatoes for my homemade potato salad, and prepping my secret recipe candied yams. I’d make my whipped cream pound cake and peach pie, praying that the texture and consistency of both are just right, fretting over perfection just like my mother and grandmothers once did. During the celebration, our meal would be loud and boisterous; food, laughter, music, and conversations would become imprinted on the hearts of my guests because food fuels connection and memory.
For me, the perfect Juneteenth is a celebration of heritage, resilience, and the bonds that unite generations. Juneteenth always makes me grateful and leaves me feeling deeply connected to the legacy we carry forward.
—Dr. Blair E. Kelley, scholar and author of Black Freedom: A Visual History of Juneteenth and Emancipation Days
My ideal Juneteenth is…
A party in the park where “we just keep dancing”
The most perfect Juneteenth happens in Fort Greene Park. House music pumps through the speakers as a sea of bodies sway in sync. Just as the day becomes almost too hot, the sky opens up and rain pours down. It smells of wet pavement, sweat, and incense. Nobody runs. We just keep dancing. The music continues, the crowd cheers. And then the sun comes out again. There is nothing more powerful than a collective intention, and when the intention is joy and pride and celebration and veneration, nothing can go wrong.
—Satchel Lee, photographer and filmmaker
My ideal Juneteenth is…
Getting a signal that family is freedom
I know little to nothing about my Black birthfather beyond what the white people who cast him out of my life told me. None of it was good, and most of it was racist. He died before I could fully see him separate from the way whiteness had described him to me, but I think about him all the time. I have just two pictures of him, both from when he was in his late twenties. I did meet him, finally, at an Au Bon Pain in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 23 years after those photos were taken. He looked nothing like the man in the pictures. Time, loneliness, being unhoused, out of steady work, health issues, and just being a Black man in America had all visibly aged him.

I saw him two more times after that, before moving to New York to start my life and career. Memorably, the second of the two, and the last time I saw him alive, we met at a restaurant in Cambridge that played jazz and afro-funk music at night. This time my then-boyfriend came with me. It was around Christmastime, and my birthfather had come with gifts he almost certainly could not have afforded. But the sheer joy in his face as he gave them to us was like a beacon in the dark crowd.
And I realized that his generosity made him feel free. Free from the way he had been mischaracterized by whiteness. Free from the shame of being banished from his infant daughter’s life without comment or question. Free from the constant, dull ache he described from growing up in foster care and government housing, without any family at all. Now he had family. And family was freedom.
In the program from my birthfather’s memorial service, it was written that “he cherished the memory of a daughter.” My most perfect Juneteenth celebration would be to get some sort of signal, on June 19th, that his memory of me is wrapped in the freedom he felt when he bestowed those Christmas gifts, and knew that he had finally found family.
—Rebecca Carroll, editor-at-large, The Meteor
Three Questions About...Animal Sex
Perrin Roosevelt Ireland’s new book about nature’s “horndogs” is a wild and feminist ride.
By Dr. Ayana Elizabeth Johnson
Did you know that climate change is causing the albatross divorce rate to spike? Or that lionesses have sex 100 times when in heat? Perrin Roosevelt Ireland’s new illustrated book, Poking the Squid: What We Can Learn From Animal Sex, will teach you everything you had no idea you didn’t know about how non-humans do it. Ireland is an artist and environmentalist whose book is an utterly delightful journey through the animal kingdom, brought to life with her effusive watercolor drawings. We asked Ireland about animals’ pleasure, sexual orientation, and gender behavior—and how these things intertwine with feminist and queer theory. (They do!)
One of the things I most appreciate about this book is how scientifically rigorous it is. You interviewed more than 50 scientists, and read hundreds of peer-reviewed papers. What’s the wildest thing you learned while researching?
We could do more rigorous reassessing of evolutionary theories, specifically sexual selection theory. For example, Kaya Tombak, an evolutionary biologist, said to me that we've never actually studied whether egg cells are more energetically intensive to make in the body than sperm cells.
We assume the animal that makes eggs is more invested in the fate of the offspring, wants to have sex less frequently, and is going to energetically protect her body. Victorians were the ones generating the initial theory that, like Darwin, sets up these gender roles that we repeat and replicate and project onto animals: female animals that are coy, less interested in sex, and want to take care of babies. And you have males that want to wander the globe and shoot their shot because sperm's easy to make. This set of assumptions comes up over and over again in the way we talk about animals. So I started asking each of the researchers whether [those assumptions] had been assessed in [the species they study]. And often they would say, "No, and I don't even know how you would design that experiment."

One theme of the book is that earlier researchers were also blinded by their own heteronormativity. Then, over time, we’ve learned that actually there is incredible sexual diversity across the animal kingdom. So what can humans learn from animal sex? More specifically, what can we learn from animals about how to have better sex?
I think we can learn that sexual diversity is biodiversity, that “all God's critters got a place in the choir.” Animals don't kill each other when they change sex countless times across a lifetime [as some fish and amphibians do]. They don't harm each other or remove each other from communities if they're carrying a multiplicity of sexes in one body [as banana slugs and earthworms do]. They are partaking of pleasure without judgment. And they are sexual geniuses. Life has come up with astoundingly inspiring ways to keep making more of itself.
And I love the “better” question because better for who? What works for me, what is better for me, might not be for another animal, given what they need in their evolutionary history and for their species to thrive. Like, dolphins can teach us better oral sex because they are echolocating on each other's genitalia. And dolphins can access frequencies far beyond the scope of human hearing. So we can't even imagine how pleasurable that might be. And then you pair that with more recent developments of understanding how innervated and complex the dolphin clitoris is and how large it is, and that's quite a compelling combination.
My first exposure to your work was being charmed by your deadpan Instagram videos where you hula hoop while explaining the sexual behaviors of various species. But before that, you worked at the Natural Resource Defense Council for a decade, and the majority of what you post on social media is about habitat conservation. Help us connect these dots between animal sexual diversity and conservation.
It's pretty hard to be an animal lover during a sixth mass extinction. Part of why I talk a lot about animals to people is to not be alone with that. It's so excruciating to me every day. And I can't talk about my joy in finding out how much sex a lioness has when she’s in heat, which is so fun, without talking about habitat loss and climate change. We are currently making impossible the kinkery we celebrate in this book. I can't talk about albatross monogamy without talking about how much plastic they're living in. I can't talk about a 50-pound elephant dick without talking about how the savanna's gone. I can't talk about seal lesbian relationships without talking about how fur seals got listed as endangered after this book went to the printer.
The environmental movement's communication for my whole lifetime has been about loss, about despair, about stemming tides of harm, and not as much focused on the beautiful world we want. How do I invite people in, in a planetary crisis, to this sense of resilience and ability to act from a place of love? I just want to provide people an opportunity to get a giggle and then take an action on behalf of the horndogs that they most admire in the book.

Dr. Ayana Elizabeth Johnson is a marine biologist, teacher, and author of What If We Get It Right?: Visions of Climate Futures.



























































