You Can’t Pay Us to Have More Kids

April 22, 2025

Free daycare, though?? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

April 22, 2025

Greetings, Meteor readers,

It’s Earth Day! And also, it’s Taurus season! May we all feel some stabilizing, comforting energy over the next few weeks because boy, do we need it.

In today’s newsletter, Nona Willis Aronowitz explains what’s behind the administration’s “make more babies” plan. Plus, we bid farewell to the pope.

Bulls up,

Shannon Melero

WHAT’S GOING ON

Baby bust: Yesterday, the New York Times reported that the pro-natalist Trump administration, concerned about the U.S.’s falling birth rate, has been brainstorming ways to get American women to have more children. Some of their ideas include five-thousand-dollar baby bonuses, menstrual-cycle education, and a National Medal of Motherhood (a tactic you might recognize from the Nazis). Notably missing: plans to subsidize childcare, parental leave, or any other crucial improvements actual families have been requesting for generations. Lots of incredulous reactions across the internet made that exact point: “How can you expect us to have more babies without a strong social safety net?”

As someone who yearns for free daycare and paid maternity leave, I’m tempted to say the same. Yes, it’s darkly ironic that the Trump administration is calling for more babies even as it has made deep cuts to maternal and child health and opposed any repair of the U.S.’s woefully inadequate family policies. But the thing is, offering benefits to families doesn’t actually boost birth rates. In fact, many countries that provide robust support for parents, like Finland, Norway, and Germany, have birth rates below ours. There’s no evidence that Trump’s proposed policies would work, either. “Even the richest, savviest, most committed governments” are stumped, a history professor told Vox in 2023. “If such policies were discoverable, I think someone would have discovered them.”

So the question you’re probably wondering is: What’s so bad about the birth rate falling? Most countries in the world are now below the “replacement rate” of 2.1, and the trend is most pronounced in the richest nations; the United States is at about 1.6, a drop of more than 20 percent in the last decade. Seen one way, fewer babies is a success story of women truly having control over their own lives, and—thanks to contraception access, education, and career opportunities—being able to make choices that may or may not involve children. Maybe those decisions “shouldn’t scare us,” writes feminist writer Jill Filipovic, “but should inform us that when women have more options and opportunities, women’s desires become far more varied.”

Still, experts across the political spectrum agree that a shrinking population with more old people than young presents huge economic and humanitarian challenges. An aging society means fewer workers to keep society functioning—to grow our food, to build our houses, to care for the elderly. For many, the story of South Korea, which has the lowest birth rate in the world, provides a disconcerting glimpse of what happens when so few babies are born: 1 in 5 people in South Korea are over 65, and nearly 40 percent of those elders live in poverty.

But no matter how valid these concerns are, Trump’s “solutions” are both demeaning (ugh, that medal) and historically familiar: The one way governments have temporarily bumped up birth rates throughout history is by oppressing women. Think Nazi Germany and its Lebensborn program, which used women as incubators for 20,000 “Aryan” babies. Or Ceausescu’s Romania, which severely restricted abortion and birth control access to devastating effect. Even our own “baby boom” in the repressive 1950s partially relied on pushing women into domesticity. This brand of pro-natalism—promoted by people like J.D. Vance, Tucker Carlson, and Elon Musk—often goes hand-in-hand with racism and anti-immigrant sentiment. While immigration is often touted as a short-term solution to the U.S.’s low birth rate, the Trump administration’s cocktail of natalism and xenophobia makes clear that they don’t want more babies of all kinds, just white, Christian babies in heterosexual nuclear families.

So, yes, I agree that we should seriously grapple with how to reshape society in the face of population decline. I just don’t trust this administration—with its blatant disregard for families and basic human decency—to do it.

—Nona Willis Aronowitz

AND:

Following the death of Pope Francis on Monday, the news cycle was flooded with praise and in-depth examination of his polarizing legacy. Over his 12 years of service, Francis was a champion of immigrants and the poor, modeling his papacy after his namesake St. Francis of Assisi. In his final months, he also spoke out staunchly against the violence in Gaza, even using his final Easter sermon to call for peace. Still, as he himself pointed out multiple times, Pope Francis was the head of a corrupt church that even under his watch continued to abuse children, protect predators, and deny the sacrament of matrimony to same-sex couples. Did he bring the massive reform that many Catholics were calling for? No. But did he, as Phillip Picardi explained last year, create, for many faithful, “an opportunity for healing or reconciliation after a lifetime of religious-based trauma” through declarations and sermons? Yes. And that may be his true legacy.

POPE FRANCIS DELIVERED HIS FINAL EASTER SERMON AT THE VATICAN THE DAY BEFORE HE DIED. VIA GETTY IMAGES

In March, Ricardo Prada Vásquez called a friend from a Texas detention center to let him know he was being deported to El Salvador. But Vásquez never made it there, and his family, friends, and the U.S. government have no record of where he was deported to. An attorney with the National Immigrant Justice Center working to locate Vásquez told the New York Times that the story was “incredibly tragic—and we don’t know how many Ricardos there are.” (The story of Kilmar Abrego Garcia implies there may be many.)
In related news, Dr. Noor Abdalla, who is married to detained Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, gave birth to the couple’s first child yesterday; her husband remains a political prisoner at a facility in Louisiana. In a statement, Abdalla wrote, “Despite our request for ICE to allow Mahmoud to attend the birth, they denied his temporary release to meet our son. This was a purposeful decision by ICE to make me, Mahmoud, and our son suffer.”

COLUMBIA STUDENTS AND ALUMNI CHAINED THEMSELVES TO THE UNIVERSITY’S MAIN GATE LAST WEEK TO PROTEST THE DETENTION OF STUDENTS. (VIA GETTY IMAGES)

Yesterday, Kenyan long-distance runner Sharon Lokedi won the women’s elite division of the Boston Marathon, completing it in two hours and 17 minutes, breaking the record previously held by Buzunesh Deba. We’ve come a long, glorious way from the first official run of Kathrine Switzer.
The Mississippi Supreme Court has upheld a judge’s decision that trans people in the state may not legally change their names until they’re 21, even with parental consent. The ruling comes after a trans teenager and his parents filed for a name change in their county and were denied. But as writer S. Baum points out, girls in Mississippi can get married and change their last names to match their husbands…at age 15. Make it make sense.
Still trying to figure out what the hubbub is about AI? Well, some scientists and researchers are currently using it to rescue all of us from a potential “sixth mass extinction.” Not as fun as turning yourself into a Studio Ghibli character, but who am I to yuck anybody’s AI yum?
Let’s leave on a high note! Last year at our Free Future event, held in partnership with the Ford Foundation, former Hallandale, Florida, vice mayor Sabrina Javellana recounted her harrowing story of being targeted with deepfake porn images made and circulated without her consent. Local law enforcement told her the violation was “heinous,” but that there was nothing they could do. But Javellana persisted, and “turned my pain into advocacy,” getting a law passed to make creating any kind of nonconsensual deepfake a felony. Watch—and cheer for her—here.