Hi Meteor readers! Spring housekeeping: you won’t see my name as much around these parts for a while, as I’m shifting my focus exclusively to a book I’m writing about my upbringing in Wyoming and the myth of the American West. (Short version: the hypermasculine white narrative of Western Expansion has always been a lie.) I’ll miss you all, but don’t worry—I’ll be back. More importantly, and FORTUNATELY FOR YOU: you will start seeing the name of the great Samhita Mukhopadhyay, who’s joining Shannon Melero on this newsletter ship and is simply one of the best humans around.

In today’s newsletter, Shannon writes about the start of Ramadan and asks why non-Muslims still know so little about a holiday observed by two billion people. And after that, we’ve got a wonderful comic strip from Huda Fahmy with tips on how to be mindful of your Muslim co-workers this year. Check it all out, right after the news. And call if you’re in Wyoming!

—Julianne Escobedo Shepherd

WHAT'S GOING ON

• American politics are truly making me feel like that It’s Always Sunny meme. In the latest twist, the Congressional January 6 committee voted this week to hold certain Trump associates in contempt—the proceedings included a must-watch statement from Rep. Jamie Raskin about the urgency of protecting U.S. democracy.

• In the latest chapter of “Thank God these women are here,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Pramila Jayapal are leading the Congressional effort to instill ethics rules in SCOTUS and get Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from January 6 rulings before the Court, though some members of Congress including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, think he just needs to resign or be impeached outright. (He does!)

• Meanwhile, Congress will vote next week on Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s appointment to the Supreme Court—and her place is all but guaranteed now that both Republican Susan Collins and quasi-Republican Joe Manchin have publicly confirmed they will vote for her. Of course, a litany of Republicans will not, but they are hypocrites and, to paraphrase Sen. Cory Booker, nobody is gonna take away this joy.

• I know we’re all “dramatically bored” with Oscars talk, but one story went slightly under the radar: a load of our favorite stars crossed a picket line outside the Chateau Marmont Sunday for Jay-Z and Beyoncé’s post-Academy Awards party. Workers are on strike because of what they say is a pervasive culture of racism and sexism. Multiple former employees have filed suits. To support striking Chateau Marmont workers, you can learn more and sign a boycott pledge here.

AND:

• Some Catholic officials and academics are pushing back on the “moral absolutism” and extremist rhetoric of anti-abortion laws being passed around the United States. “Those who claim to be pro-life are acting in ways that are violent and vicious and dehumanizing toward women,” one pastoral studies professor told the National Catholic Reporter.

• Relatedly, all I really have to say here is… what the actual fuck????

• The New York Times’ Jaeah Lee reported on the way rap lyrics are often introduced as evidence in criminal trials and bail hearings—regardless of whether the judge, jury, or attorneys have the range to understand common tropes in rap music. She found that this practice fosters “what legal scholars sometimes call racialized character evidence.”

• On Thursday, a US federal court struck down portions of Florida’s Senate Bill 90, which the League of Women Voters described as containing “anti-voter measures that raised barriers to voting,” for students, the elderly, and voters of color.

• “The Feminist Face of Russian Protests”

• On being transmasculine in sex work: “We exist”

• Redemption for Charo, guitar virtuoso!

—JES

HAPPY HOLIDAYS

Remember to Wish Your Friends a Blessed Ramadan This Year 

And please, while we’re celebrating, take some time to educate yourself on what it is

BY SHANNON MELERO

A SHOP SELLING RAMADAN DECORATIONS IN GAZA (PHOTO BY MAJDI FATHI VIA GETTY IMAGES)

I converted to Islam sometime in 2014, secretly, in a bathroom. I’d love to tell you that “bathroom” is some sort of metaphor, but I took my Shahadah (declaration of faith) in a literal bathroom by myself and told very few people what I had done for almost a year. Why the cloak and dagger? I was a church youth leader. On weekends I would teach teens about their Lord and savior, Jesus Christ. And while Jesus is a beloved homie in Islam, I didn’t fully believe a lot of what I was teaching. But I cared for those youngsters and the thought of leaving them in the hands of other adults who wouldn’t understand them felt like a betrayal.

So I hid my faith and continued working at the church, where my mother was associate pastor, until I was asked to leave (but that’s another very dramatic story for another time).

Not too long after my conversion—my first Ramadan was upon me. It was horrific. I didn’t make it through the first two weeks of fasting. In the years since, there have been plenty more “failed” Ramadans for me, which have all met their end in a similar fashion—a hunger-induced brain fog where I start asking myself: Why are we doing this? Why am I doing this? Why is it so long? Why couldn’t I be drawn to Catholicism? That seems like it’s not too hard. Before you know it, I’m face down in a bag of spicy sweet chili Doritos like a raccoon on speed.

Ramadan isn't supposed to deplete you...it's supposed to reinvigorate you.

I wasn’t alone in this line of questioning (although I was absolutely alone on the Doritos binge). Canadian journalist, podcaster, and fellow Muslimah Shireen Ahmed tells me that she also stared down difficult questions, like: “What am I actually doing? And why am I doing it? Is it because I want to please Allah or do I want to be able to flex that I’m fasting?”

Ramadan is a beautiful time full of reflection, elaborate community meals, a focus on charity, finishing the Quran and an obscene amount of dates (the fruit!). But fasting seems to be the thing we all get stuck on, both inside and outside of the Muslim community. “What kind of parent would let their kid starve all day,” I’ve heard non-Muslims say. (You know who you are and I will not let that go.) But when I was in Catholic school and it was time to choose what we were giving up for Lent, no one lobbed the same judgment. When I took up the Daniel Fast during my teen years with my family, that was normal.

What many non-Muslims choose to remain ignorant about is that fasting is scalable, and it’s also not the only way to participate in Ramadan. Not everyone fasts: There are those who simply cannot fast, because they’re pregnant, suffer from eating disorders, or are on medication. There are also those who simply don’t want to, which is as valid a reason as any other. “Ramadan isn’t supposed to deplete you to a point where you can’t function,” Ahmed says. “It’s supposed to reinvigorate you.”

People know who Muslims are. I just don’t think they’ve learned that we’re not monolithic.

Ahmed was born into the Muslim faith and understands as well as anyone the struggle that comes with the fast, but also the fun there is to be had within the community. “In the summertime, after Taraweeh, the Tim Horton’s is like nuts,” she says. For those who don’t know, “Taraweeh” is a special night prayer that takes place after we break fast and is often a huge community gathering. Taraweeh is a lot longer than the length of the five prayers Muslims are obligated to do every day and if you attend a poppin’ mosque, it can go on until sunrise.

So why do we celebrate Ramadan? Were you to ask five Muslims that question, you’d have five completely different answers. Some will say it’s a way to ensure a place in heaven. Others do it to understand suffering, or to develop humility. Some seek to develop community. Some make goals to memorize Quran. And the list goes on and on.

But an answer you rarely hear from our leaders is “introspection,” something a lot of us end up doing anyway.

Sure, we’re asked to reflect on our sins and seek forgiveness, but we never talk about extending that forgiveness to ourselves. “When we think about worship, we think about submission...but there’s also an internal spiritual self that needs taking care of,” Ahmed explains. Yet our focus is pulled in so many different directions over the course of 30 days. Decorating, planning iftars (the fast-breaking meal), memorizing Quran, attending Taraweeh, and on top of that, maintaining our normal work or school schedules. It’s a grueling marathon made all the more difficult by having to move in a world that looks at Muslims sideways simply for existing.

Seriously. Not even water. Don't bring it up.

I’d love to blame non-Muslims for all of this but really, Ramadan has always had a bit of a branding problem. We don’t have a mascot like all of the other holidays; there is nothing to put a smiling face on 30 days of Hunger Games. (No disrespect to Rafiq the Ramadan date palm tree, who is a mascot for the under-five group.) Without some sort of hyper-commercialized gloss over it, non-Muslims can only understand Ramadan through the portrayals already in front of them, and it’s not like the nuances of faith made it into any episodes of Homeland. (If you are looking for a show about Muslims that isn’t about terrorism, I recommend We Are Lady Parts. And as far as Ramadan goes, Ahmed points out there's an entire “micro-economy” around this holiday dominated mostly by women of color who sell dates, decorations, Eid outfits, and even Ramadan trees!)

But instead of helping us string up some cute Ramadan lights, folks want to scuritinize religious fasting anew despite being able to mind their own when former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was doing it as a wellness habit. “I had a teammate who told me once what I was doing was unhealthy and it's like please, no one asked you," Ahmed recalls. Particularly as we prepare for the fast, Muslims are inundated with outside opinions on our entire belief system and all of its flaws. “The world is not where it was 30 years ago, but we should be further along,” Ahmed explains. “People know what Ramadan is. People know who Muslims are. I just don’t think they’ve learned that we’re not monolithic.”

While I’d love to argue with and educate every person who clings to the monolith, I try to follow my mother’s advice: God doesn’t need you to play defense. (But find me on the wrong day, and you will catch these holy hands, I promise you that.)

“We are not new to this. We know ourselves, and I know myself well enough at 45 to handle it. Do I get tired? Yes. But I get tired anyway. Like, the point is just because you’re uninformed doesn’t mean that we are,” Ahmed says.

I’m sure this year, I’ll ask myself once again why I’m doing any of this—and because I’m hangry, I won’t have an answer. But in my current satiated and clear-headed state, the answer seems painfully obvious: because it’s what I believe.

BEFORE YOU GO

Know better, do better. Artist and author Huda Fahmy  writes some of the funniest comic strips about the Muslim experience. She also put together a handy How-To on making workplaces more accommodating for Muslim employees.

Copyright © 2022 by Huda Fahmy. All rights reserved.

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

It’s hump day and what a week it’s been already. I know I’m not alone when I say I don’t think any of us will soon forget the incident at Sunday's Oscars. Obviously, I’m talking about the grand larceny that was Billie Eilish winning best original song over Lin-Manuel Miranda’s “Dos Oruguitas.” It’s absolutely absurd! Other than that, it was a pretty boring show. (Just kidding, we’ll get to the other thing in a minute.)

In today’s newsletter, we’re talking about the Biden administration’s brand-spanking-new budget (weird how you can budget when you’ve got no money). This one is of particular interest as it omits the Hyde Amendment, opening the door to federal funding for abortions. It’s the second time President Biden has made this move—but with all of the anti-abortion legislation at the state level, what’s it really mean? Julianne Escobedo Shepherd will tell you!

But first, let’s get newsy with it.

—Shannon Melero

WHAT'S GOING ON

• Democrats are asking Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from any and all upcoming cases linked to the January 6 insurrection. As we mentioned last Saturday, Judge Thomas’s wife, Virginia, sent some wild text messages to Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, posing a huge conflict of interest for the justice. Honestly, it’s giving Bill from this season of Real Housewives of New Jersey. IYKYK.

• Speaking of drama, there’s more brewing in the Trump camp: A joint report from CBS and the Washington Post reveals there was a seven-hour gap in Trump’s White House phone logs on the day of the insurrection. The House select committee is now trying to suss out whether the missing hours are part of a cover-up or if Trump was using burners or his aides’ cell phones during that time.

• A hotel in South Dakota tried to enforce a policy banning Native Americans from the establishment after a young Native man was shot on the property a few weeks ago. The police have not determined what led to the shooting, but the hotel owner Connie Uhre has previously posted anti-Native sentiments, blaming the Native community for the shooting and “all the vandalism” around the hotel. Now, a non-profit organization representing the Sioux Nation has filed a federal class-action lawsuit. The tribe’s elders also served the Grand Gateway hotel with a trespassing order which claims the hotel is on Native land.

AND: 

• Facebook or Meta or whatever she goes by these days reportedly paid a right-wing advertising firm to malign TikTok. Sounds like a waste of money when they could have just hired a bunch of Boomers to post on Facebook how much they don’t get TikTok.

• March is over, which means I have to face my horrible bracket. How did yours turn out?

• Eric Adams is doing all he can to come off as a cool mayor to distract from the war he’s waging against unhoused people in New York City.

• How does one get invited to a DC orgy? Asking for a friend.

• Meet my new doctor, everyone.

—SM

YOUR TAX DOLLARS, YOUR BODY

Dems, Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is

Federally funded abortion is in the 2023 budget, so let's make sure it stays that way

BY JULIANNE ESCOBEDO SHEPHERD

PRESIDENT AND OMB DIRECTOR SHALANDA YOUNG PASSING AROUND THIS YEAR'S BUDGET SPREADSHEET. (PHOTO BY ANNA MONEYMAKER VIA GETTY IMAGES) 

President Biden released his 2023 budget this week and in a bit of *good* news for humankind, it includes a provision that omits the Hyde Amendment and allows federal funds for anyone seeking an abortion. This is the second time since Biden took office that he’s included this directive, and while it got axed last year thanks to one single man (take a wild guess, his name rhymes with “overexpansion”), it’s an important statement about protecting the right to abortion in a year when states across the country are effectively banning the procedure, and will likely see the gutting of Roe v. Wade.

A quick history of the Hyde Amendment: First passed in 1976 after its introduction by the virulent anti-abortion Congressman Henry Hyde, it barred federal funds—that is, Medicaid and Medicare—from being allocated towards abortion. Its legality was challenged for several years, and so it didn’t take effect until 1980 when the all-male Supreme Court declared it constitutional by a 5-4 split—promptly leading to over four decades of struggle for people who need the procedure, but might not be able to afford it.

Unsurprisingly, Hyde impacts low-income women of color most of all. And that unfair economic burden is what Biden is taking aim at in his budget proposal, which touts “bold commitments to advance women’s economic security, gender-based violence prevention and response, and sexual and reproductive health and rights both at home and around the world.”

The proposal isn’t perfect. It provides $400 million to Title X family planning to “improve overall access to vital reproductive and preventive health services and advance gender and health equity” (great!), but the word “abortion” is nowhere to be seen (not great; it’s a simple medical procedure, people). And there are other, larger issues with the budget—an astronomical, 700% increase in funding for ICE, for instance, as well as giant bumps for police and military spending—all of which can make it feel like its basic support for women, LGBTQIA+ people, and families is all Oliver Twist begging with an empty bowl. (Please sir, may I have some childcare?) Besides,  Shmoe Shmansion is still on his warpath to sink any legislation that might actually help people—including this Title X allocation, where he’s likely to reintroduce Hyde yet again.

But still, it’s important. The move was praised by leaders like Rep. Ayanna Pressley, who called Hyde “racist and discriminatory” (it is), and Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson who, in a statement, called the budget “an essential opportunity to underscore the administration’s values.” Amid a countrywide crisis for reproductive rights, Biden’s stand against Hyde signals to those of us who believe in equal healthcare that we still have some ground in this fight. Not to be all “call your Congressional representative,” but—call your Congressional representative! And if anyone asks, Joe Manchin’s number is (202) 224-3954. Thank you!

ONE LAST TIME

Please Scrub This Year’s Oscars From My Brain

BY SHANNON MELERO

THE ONLY PERSON WHOSE OPINION TRULY MATTERS IN ALL OF THIS. (PHOTO BY MYUNG CHUNG VIA GETTY IMAGES) 

As you may have heard a few thousand times, on Sunday, 16 million people watched as Will Smith arose from his front-row seat at the Oscars, walked on stage, and slapped Chris Rock after Rock made an insensitive joke directed at Jada Pinkett Smith—who has been living with alopecia for four years. That brief exchange has stretched into three days’ worth of discourse, covering every nook and cranny of the moment. The slap has meant different things to different people—with some seeing it as an example of toxic masculinity, others seeing a deserved response to a bad joke, and some questioning why a joke so entrenched in misogynoir had to be made at all. Since Sunday, Smith has apologized, and Jada has posted a new Instagram tile about healing. It sounds like we’re all just about ready to move forward from this.

However, this incident was precipitated by a cruel, ableist joke at the end of the day, which is an element worth highlighting. Alopecia is an autoimmune disorder that attacks a person’s hair follicles, resulting in hair loss, and it is, in fact, a disability—one that disproportionately affects Black women. So while the broadcast spent an evening celebrating one groundbreaking depiction of disability (the film CODA, about a Deaf white family), another was being mocked—and it's possible that everyone in that room (including Will Smith) would have laughed and moved on if it hadn't exploded into a spectacle.

Of all the voices that had something to say (and nearly everyone said something), let’s end it with the words of Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, another Black woman living with alopecia. “Our bodies are not public domain,” she wrote in a tweet Monday. “They are not a line in a joke—especially when the transformation is not of our choosing.”

Instead of sharing another slap meme, why not share this newsletter with your friends! 

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

Hey Meteor readers! This week has been a living how it started/how it's going meme. It began with the historic confirmation hearings to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court—hearings in which the most qualified and brilliant nominee in years was made to rebuke a pasty melange of Republicans who used their time to racistly invoke spurious and dangerous lies about her record.

And the week ended with the revelation that sitting Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's wife Ginni was (BIG GULP OF AIR) texting deranged QAnon conspiracy theories supporting overturning the 2020 election to Mark Meadows, Trump's chief of staff, around the same time that Trump was hoping SCOTUS would help him… overturn the election.

We've got a lot more on all this in the news, and after that, Rebecca Carroll writes about Judge Jackson's exceptionality and whether her confirmation hearings may have woken white America up to the double standard Black women endure every day.

—Julianne Escobedo Shepherd

WHAT'S GOING ON

• Soooo, yeah. Ginni Thomas? The far-right activist married to the longest-serving SCOTUS Justice? Who notoriously left Anita Hill a voicemail 10 years ago demanding an apology for testifying in Congress about Clarence Thomas’s sexual harassment? Which she framed as “why you did what you did with my husband”? Yeah, so…she spent the days after the election texting Trump’s chief of staff Meadows a litany of conspiracy theories (like painting a normal democratic election as a left-wing “heist”) and demanding that Sidney Powell, the Q lawyer who briefly represented Trump, be the face of the “Stop the Steal” effort. The texts were reported by the Washington Post.

• This is significant because when SCOTUS went on to rule that Trump could not block the Jan. 6 committee from gathering White House records, Ginni Thomas’s husband did not recuse himself. In fact, he was the lone dissenter—ruling in the minority against a request for information that eventually exposed his wife’s texts to Meadows. Did he know this? We don’t know. Should he be questioned about it and potentially impeached and yeeted off SCOTUS? LOL yes. To paraphrase an old adage: shoulda believed Anita Hill.

• All of this unfortunately dovetailed with the fact that the most spurious of Republican claims during Ketanji Brown Jackson’s hearings—the lie that she was soft on child sex offenders—was also rooted in QAnon conspiracy theories. The line of questioning isn’t just misleading; it’s actively dangerous. As NPR reported this week, these attacks have resulted in an uptick in chatter about Judge Jackson on fringe websites—and some of the posts have been violent.

• And then there’s the way Judge Jackson was treated—and expected to behave—in contrast to 2018 nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Elie Mystal’s piece for the Nation, “Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Long Pause,” teased this out perfectly: “Everybody knew that, in the same situation, Kavanaugh could and did sneer at his questioners, threaten the Senate with political retribution, and declare his undying love for beer, without hurting his chances at unaccountable lifetime power. Power he now holds.”

• Even after all that, though, there was joy—enough to carry us through the week. If Senator Cory Booker’s passionate exhortation on the last day of her hearings was the most moving bit of video, the most emblematic photo of this process was taken by Sarahbeth Maney, a 25-year-old Black woman photojournalist. “I noticed how proud her daughter was of her,” Maney told the Times, “and it gave me chills when I saw this look that her daughter gave her. It was just this look of such pride and admiration.”

  AND:

• A powerful, must-read Eleine Hseih Chou essay about the specific and violent ways Asian women are fetishized among white men

• A beautiful piece by the LA Times’s Jean Guerrero on what is lost when white assimilation demands the Anglicization of non-Anglo last names

• A sprawling investigation into why one Black community in Columbia, South Carolina has an astronomical rate of diabetes-related amputations.

• A nice profile about Lux Magazine, a Leftist feminist publication you should definitely read

• Fuck yeah, Precious Lee!

—JES

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

On Being Twice as Good to Get Half as Much

Black women could have predicted what KBJ went through. So why are so many people surprised? 

BY REBECCA CARROLL

THE FACE OF A WOMAN WHO HAS HAD ENOUGH (PHOTO BY CHIP SOMODEVILLA VIA GETTY IMAGES) 

Last week, during the Senate confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, after hours of watching the relentless, shameless and openly racist baiting by white male senators of the country’s first Black woman Supreme Court nominee, I posted a tweet:

The way that a Black woman in America can be as highly, hyper educated, intelligent, elegant, skilled, experienced and qualified as KBJ and still be treated like this by white men on national television. It’s not even symbolic. It’s a glaring body of evidence. 

I didn’t feel as though I was saying anything special or new. I’m a Black woman in America who has not only experienced this kind of racism and misogyny, but has made it my life’s work to call it out in everything I make and do. In fact, I have said or written some iteration of what’s in that tweet literally dozens of times, to varying levels of response.

I said it when I first started in magazine journalism, and my ideas were passed over for the less-developed ones of my white peers. I said it when Michelle Obama was in the White House, constantly tested and scrutinized by the media despite the fact that she showed up more graceful, poised, and magnanimous than it was perhaps reasonable to expect. I said it on my podcast Billie Was a Black Woman, for this reason exactly—because Billie Holiday, among the most influential jazz singers of all time, was a Black woman, and as such, was relentlessly targeted and pursued by the FBI all the way to her grave. This is the same historical double-burden of racism and sexism that Jackson, among the most qualified Supreme Court nominees in the history of this country, is experiencing today.

I’ve seen this. I know this. Not new.

But this time, for whatever reason, it struck a chord. Over the first 48 hours, the tweet was liked nearly 170,000 times and retweeted by over 30,000 people—including, I might add, white male political figures Robert Reich and Howard Dean.

All of which mystifies me. Why now? How can you say a thing a thousand times and not have it truly be heard until the thousandth time? Is it just an algorithm? Was it the collective witnessing of what Judge Jackson had gone through? Event television? And mostly, I wondered: Will this change anything for Black women?

We aren’t just forbidden from being “the best,” we are simply not allowed to have or hold the word and its meaning 

Some comments on the tweet, not surprisingly, were from fellow Black women who knew all too well what we were witnessing as we watched Senator Lindsey Graham bitterly interrogate Jackson, and callously speak over her answers, while palpably seething with resentment over her sheer presence. For many of those women, it evoked that famous scene from Scandal, when Papa Pope tells his already exceedingly successful grown Black daughter, Olivia, that she has to be “twice as good as them to get half what they have!”

One Black woman in the comments put it a bit differently, tweeting: “We have to be better than the best.” And in Judge Jackson’s case, “better than the best” isn’t an exaggeration. By definition and anyone’s standard — including the white one — she is the living, breathing embodiment of the best. Judge Jackson went to Harvard University (magna cum laude) and Harvard Law (cum laude), became a judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals, a Supreme Court clerk, and a public defender. There’s no “best” for her to be “better” than.

LINDSEY GRAHAM, A DISGRACE TO LINDSEYS EVERYWHERE (PHOTO BY SCOTT APPLEWHITE VIA GETTY IMAGES)

And that’s it right there.

The hearings weren’t just about the way that white America continues to move the goalposts for success when it comes to Black women (and all people of color); it’s about the way it unrepentantly steals words and lynches language in actual plain sight. We aren’t just forbidden from being “the best,” we are simply not allowed to have or hold the word and its meaning. And if we try, especially in public, white America will snatch it right out of our exhaustively achieved grasp.

This week made that reality visible. Because it wasn’t just Black women and other Black folks and people of color who responded to my tweet — white people, lots of them, tweeted comments like, “Those Senators make me ashamed to be a white man.” Some responses felt genuine, others performative. Either way, clearly some (most?) white people are just starting to understand the kind of racism we endure all the time—because they were seeing the evidence. They, and all of us, were watching it right in front of our eyes. I’m still not sure Why Now, but I’m also not that interested in speculating about why white people do what they do; I’m more interested in us and in finding our harbingers of hope.

And the reactions did give me a glimmer of hope. Two years into our so-called “racial reckoning”—more a phrase than an actual change—it felt to me this week as if people might actually be reckoning. But there’s no real victory in the simple acknowledgment that racism exists.

I will feel victorious when Judge Jackson is.

ONE MORE THING

Nicole Chung on Having “The Talk”

The racism talk, not the sex talk

BY SHANNON MELERO

Few things terrify me more than the thought of parenting. I watch all of the parents in my life, and I am astounded and filled with equal amounts awe and fear. How does anyone stay sane while navigating the boss-level Mario Kart map that is being a parent? Particularly parents of color, who have the added responsibility of explaining complex concepts like structural racism, respectability politics, and police procedure to children under 10, because to delay such a conversation is a life-altering risk?

On this week’s episode of UNDISTRACTED, author Nicole Chung shared her story of being a transracial adoptee and parenting her own daughter, now 14, amid a surge in anti-Asian hate crimes. “I think we were always going to have these conversations” about violence against Asian women, Chung said on the episode. “Not just because she’s old enough to get news alerts on her phone, but because we’ve always had these conversations… I still feel that parental urge to want to protect her or to just like, keep her safe at home where nothing could happen.”

It made me think back to my own teen years and whether or not my mother and I ever had such a talk or how we would have even started it. My family covers a wide racial spectrum, from our Afro-Latino elders to my one cousin on my grandfather’s side, who is full Irish. When you’re a kid seeing this assortment at family functions, it’s as if racism has been magically solved. So my mom had to take a very different approach. Sparing you the details (gotta save something for the memoir), there were many things we never talked about because we had lived through them, and really when life Stone Cold stuns you in the face with a hard lesson, what’s the point in conversation?

But I’ll never forget the conversation we had when she was dropping me off at college for my freshman year—the first time we would ever be so far apart from each other. “These white girls are going to be different than what you’re used to,” she said. I attended a predominantly white institution and had already met my new white roommate via Facebook. “They’re raised different. I don’t want you picking up their habits. And remember, you already have three strikes against you. You’re Latina, you’re a woman, and you believe in God. So you need to be careful.”

And as much as I hate to admit it, my mother was right. The women I met and lived with were different, and I struggled. When assimilation failed me, I leaned into the unspoken segregation on my campus. I joined the Latino Student Union, Black Student Union, Caribbean Student Association, and even the Asian Student Association—just to fill up the week with people who understood to some degree what I was going through. My weekends were devoted to hockey games and parties with my white friends because, despite our differences, I didn’t want to totally cut them out. It also helped that with a few strokes of a flatiron I could blend in with any white crowd (just not during the summer).

And maybe that’s part of why my mother was able to skip some of these conversations: I easily pass, and I was born a people pleaser. But eventually, my turn will come to have a small human, and if I remember seventh-grade genetics correctly, they’ll look like my husband and won’t pass as I do. And even though I’m nowhere near parenthood, I’m already trying to figure out how to have a useful talk with my future kid about race. I reckon that once the big moment comes, I’ll feel much like Chung, who told host Brittany Packnett Cunningham, “The adult you, with the adult perspective… You look back on these moments you experienced, many of them before you had the tools or the vocabulary or the support or the community or whatever it is you needed to kind of deal with it…and it really messes you up a little bit.”

One thing I am certain of is that I will be repeating Chung’s advice to her own child published in the Atlantic: “If there are those who do not consider your life precious, I hope that you can always feel assured of your own immense worth and your absolute right to be safe. You deserve to be safe. We all deserve to be safe.”

For more of Nicole and Brittany’s conversation, listen here.  

UNDISTRACTED IS SPONSORED BY:

MAILCHIMP IS AN ALL-IN-ONE MARKETING PLATFORM FOR GROWING BUSINESSES. Mailchimp helps millions of customers around the world to start and grow their businesses with world-class marketing technology, award-winning customer support, and inspiring content. Millions of businesses and individuals – from community organizations to Fortune 100 companies – trust Mailchimp to help them connect with their audience with the right message, at the right time, in the right place.

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

Hello, howdy, and hey there Meteor readers. Welcome back to your favorite part of Wednesday. It’s been an inexplicably long week and I have yet to manifest all of the intentions I set forth during my Spring Equinox full moon ritual. Is the moon ignoring my calls?

In today’s newsletter, Julianne Escobedo Shepherd contemplates the absolute clown show that has been the confirmation hearings of The Honorable Ketanji Brown Jackson. These hearings are historic, not just because of the woman in the hot seat but because it may very well be the first time a grown man asked someone if a baby was racist. I wish I was joking.

Also today, a reminder that the water crisis of your youth is still ongoing and, as with so many other things, getting worse. But first, the news!

—Shannon Melero

WHAT'S GOING ON

• Small forest fires have broken out in the area surrounding Chernobyl, which is currently under the control of the Russian military. Ukraine’s parliament reported spotting at least seven fires in the area via satellite. The report also claims that Ukrainian firefighters have not been able to manage the outbreaks because of the presence of the Russian military. The situation is “particularly dangerous” and still developing.

• The Taliban has walked back their promise to re-open girls’ high schools in Afghanistan, claiming that officials are trying to “draw up a plan for them to reopen in accordance with Islamic law.” Schools were initially supposed to reopen to all students on Wednesday for the Spring semester—and several girls’ schools did open in the morning but were immediately closed once the announcement was made. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Education attributed this move to a lack of proper uniforms for girls above grade six and a lack of female teachers. All of this has less to do with Islamic law and more to do with sex-based segregation, which begins after girls and boys pass puberty which (ostensibly) happens around the time they enter high school. In some parts of the country, girls under Grade 6 have reportedly returned to school.

• Officials and wealthy elites in Syria are creating a “maze of shell companies” to skirt international sanctions and continue funneling money into Bashar al-Assad’s government. Why should you care? Without new economic sanctions, the Syrian regime will have all the assets necessary to continue carrying out human rights violations against its citizens, which have gone largely unchecked in recent years.

• The US has reportedly run out of money to buy the next round of (vaccine) shots for everyone. That defense budget looking real plump, though, isn’t it Joseph Robinette.

AND: 

• Madeleine Albright, the first woman Secretary of State, has died at 84.

• The U.S. has officially classified the acts carried out over the last five years against the Rohingya population by Myanmar as genocide.

• TERF and author JK Rowling spent her Monday spreading misinformation about detransitioning, hormone replacement therapy, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)—all topics she appears to know nothing about. On principle, I won’t link to anything she wrote because it’s utter codswallop. So instead, here’s some informative writing on PCOS in the LGTBQ+ community.  

• The Jamaican government has started the parliamentary process of becoming a republic, which means they’ll eventually be removing Queen Elizabeth II as head of state.

• The National College Players Association filed a civil rights complaint against 350 Division I schools, claiming Black students’ rights have been violated by a “collusive athlete compensation prohibition.” Bet you didn’t have that in your March Madness bracket.

• No survivors have been found in the wreckage of a plane that crashed into a mountain in China on Monday. There were 132 people on board.

• The number of trans youth on the brink of losing gender-affirming care is staggering.

• Ashley Barty is now Ashley Retiree at the tender age of 25.

—SM

SCOTUS WATCH 

6 Takeaways from the Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson Hearings

What surprised me (and didn't) over the last 48 hours

BY JULIANNE ESCOBEDO SHEPHERD

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON ILLUSTRATES HOW MUCH PATIENCE SHE HAS LEFT FOR TED CRUZ. (PHOTO BY CHEN MENGTONG/CHINA NEWS SERVICE VIA GETTY IMAGES) 

In the last 48 hours, I have watched approximately 324 hours of confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (Please don’t challenge my math—I’ve seen Mr. Robot and claim my right to employ the same logic as Sen. John Cornyn, who told Judge Jackson that he is “not an attorney—I watch Law and Order from time to time.”)

Some of the proceedings have gone just as I’d anticipated. I expected the racist and sexist aggression that white Republicans are volleying at Judge Jackson, and I expected her response to be professional and controlled—skills she certainly was expected to triply perfect as a Black woman working in law. I expected the condescension, the gotcha questions, the abuse, and I expected her to meet them with thoughtful measure. But what actually hit me was how absurd the Republican line of questioning was, and how beautifully Judge Jackson has responded. In honor of Her Honor, my takeaways so far.

1. The racist nonsense before she even publicly spoke with Congress.

Last week, Sen. Josh Hawley introduced the lie that Judge Jackson has been soft on sentencing for child pornographers, a dog-whistle meant for the ears of the “government pedophilia conspiracy” QAnon cult. (This will continue tomorrow when Republicans introduce testimony from a lawyer for the extreme fringe group Operation Underground Railroad.) During the hearings, Hawley doubled down on these accusations despite major outlets like the Washington Post disproving them as “scurrilous”—and the reasoning was repeated in questioning from many of his worst Republican peers, including Sens. Ted Cruz, Tom Cotton, and Marsha Blackburn. The latter also spent a considerable amount of time trying to paint Judge Jackson as having been mean to anti-abortion protesters, as well as goading her to define the word “woman” in a long transphobic tirade.

2. But she’s so much smarter than these jokers.

In response to these allegations, Judge Jackson explained the circumstances in the pornography cases she ruled on, pointing out that judges are constrained by Congress’s laws and effectively showing that she knows the inner workings of Congress better than some of the people working there. All this while Senators' questions forced her repeatedly to relive the clearly painful experience of having to see, in her capacity as a judge, the “heinous” evidence in child pornography cases.

Cruz, who was one of Jackson’s peers at Harvard Law and is definitely still seething that he’s a lesser mind, also invoked the bogeyman of Critical Race Theory, an academic school of thought that most people don’t encounter until law school (if even then), and which Cruz seems to think is being taught to babies. After his barrage, Jackson paused and let out a deep sigh. It was a moment indicative of the circumstances: that a woman of her great intellect and patient temperament had to spend hour upon hour answering disingenuous and deeply uneducated questions.

WHAT SOLID PROOF DO WE HAVE THAT TED CRUZ KNOWS HOW TO READ? (PHOTO BY WIN MCNAMEE VIA GETTY IMAGES)

3. Despite all this, the hearings have been a breath of fresh air. 

Judge Jackson met even the most ridiculous questions with a level of gravity her questioners didn’t earn. She did not, like Brett Kavanaugh, whine or cry or yell at Senators—something she knows that she, as a Black woman, would end her nomination in a way it didn’t end Kavanaugh’s.

Her race and gender were a clear factor in the way a litany of white Republican Senators addressed her (note to Sen. Kennedy: Do not call a Black woman “articulate”) and even still she responded with patience. Her display of fairness and skill was exhilarating, a refreshing palate cleanser for those of us still reeling from the Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett proceedings. (For a really nice example of this, watch her exchange with Sen. Mazie Hirono, who skillfully dunked on the spurious accusations of her Republican colleagues.)

4. Judge Jackson will be an addition to the court who “thinks like America.”

Yesterday, Sen. Richard Blumenthal addressed why he thinks the Judge’s position on SCOTUS is significant. “You will make the court look and feel more like America, but also think more like America,” he said. He also asked her to address the importance of her experience as a public defender, a job he too once had. “Zealous defense council… ensures the government is protecting these rights and that people are getting due process in the criminal justice system,” she said. “That’s to all of our benefits. That helps everyone in America when we ensure that liberty cannot be denied due process.”

As Republicans repeatedly tried to paint Judge Jackson as soft on crime, this is an important point to remember. After all, as the lawyer and podcaster Josie Duffy Rice told Brittany Packnett Cunningham on a recent episode of UNDISTRACTED: “[Public defender]... is a job that should really resonate with conservatives in this country that are worried about Big Government. These are the same people that should be cheering her. Here’s someone who repeatedly stood up and tried to protect regular people from the tyranny of government.”

5. She understands the difficulties of working motherhood.

In a conversation with Senator Cory Booker, KBJ addressed her position as a working mom with visible emotion. “It’s a lot of early mornings and late nights, and what that means is there will be hearings during your daughters’ recitals. There’ll be emergencies on birthdays that you have to handle,” she said. “And I know so many young women in this country, especially who have small kids who have these momentous events, and have to make a choice. I didn’t always get the balance right.” (Her kids, though, seem to think she did all right, as evidenced by a beautiful sign on her daughter Leila’s seat: “You Got This!”)

6. Finally, nobody is tamping down the joy of this moment (dammit). 

Nothing the Republicans attempt to do can take away from this historic nomination, and I have been moved by how meaningful the moment has been—and for the sight of unadulterated hope in government at a time when there’s not a lot to feel great about. “Judge Jackson’s explanations are so clear, she is talking to the Senators but also is teaching,” tweeted National Women’s Law Center President Fatima Goss Graves. Maya Wiley noted that it is “a joyous day unto the world.” And in a profile of some of the Black women rallying in D.C. in support of KBJ, Washington Post reporter Anne Branigin writes:

“We need a little joy in this moment,” said Glynda Carr, a political strategist and co-founder of Higher Heights, a group that helps elect and support Black women in politics.

“If that little joy comes in the fact that this woman looks like us — looks like me, from my hair to my glasses to the hue of my skin — it gives you the possibilities that exist, in that we can always reach higher..”

CLIMATE CHANGE

The Water Crisis Is Getting Worse

BY SHANNON MELERO

BANGLADESHI PEOPLE TRAVELING TO GATHER WATER AMIDST AN EXTREME WATER CRISIS IN RANGAMATI. (PHOTO BY MOHAMMAD SHAJAHAN/ANADOLU AGENCY VIA GETTY IMAGES) 

Yesterday, March 22, was World Water Day, a day of observance started by the United Nations in 1993 to highlight the importance of access to fresh water sources in the global community. Unfortunately, about 2 billion people are living without access to clean water, and in 2019, 1.2 million people died from drinking unsafe water.

In fact, “in the last year, more people died from lack of access to water than from war-related violence,” Mustafa Mabruk tells me. Mabruk and his business partner Murad Noful are the cofounders of Wear the Peace, a slow fashion brand working to educate people and raise money for some of the world’s largest ongoing crises; their latest initiative is in partnership with Charity: Water, to build long term sustainable water safety in the areas most affected by the crisis. Like many of us, Mabruk and Noful are searching for the answer to what feels like an existential question: what can I, a regular person, do to solve an enormous global problem?

The first step is understanding that the problem is ours to fix. For as long as I’ve been alive, there’s been a water crisis, and for years it’s been framed as a problem other people have and not the concern of Europe or the United States. And yet, in 2014, in supposedly the most powerful nation in the world, Flint, Michigan, did not have a drop of clean water. (A crisis that is still ongoing.) The water crisis is everyday life for millions of people who will spend nearly half of their lives just walking to gather clean water. Countries that do not have entire populations actively gathering water are beginning to grapple with a lack of sustainable water sources and a future where water privatization may be the new normal.

“If there’s a time to start pushing toward a solution, it’s yesterday.”

“Climate change is the biggest cause of the current water shortage, but there’s also increased human consumption in general and overuse of water,” Nofal explains. Solving the water crisis is no longer just about building wells and providing tankards of water; now it’s intertwined with more frequent weather events, climate-based immigration, and thousands of people migrating to flee war violence. . So the big picture answers are sustainability in water gathering, better management of water resources—and understanding that war and climate change are interconnected issues. “At the end of the day, allowing a crisis to continue—allowing hundreds of years of violence and war—it’s all a choice. [Solving this crisis] comes down to political choices. All of it is doable, especially now,” Nofal says. He’s skeptically hopeful.

And while we need huge sweeping policy changes to really tackle this problem, there are steps that those of us who aren’t scientists, researchers, politicians, or Water Protectors can take to make sure this World Water Day isn’t just a blip on the calendar: Manage your water use at home, safe, clean water is finite and needs to be treated as such. Divest from fast fashion. Understand where your water comes from and how it's treated. Donate to organizations like Charity: Water. Vote for officials in local elections who back “green” legislation at the city and state levels.“If there’s a time to start pushing toward a solution,” Nofal emphasizes, “it’s yesterday.”

What's way less stressful than watching a confirmation hearing? Sharing this newsletter with your friends. Give it a try!

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

Hello and happy Saturday to you. In today’s newsletter, Julissa Arce writes about the ways white supremacy works in Mexico to denigrate Indigenous and Black Mexicans—and how her experience with white supremacy in the U.S. worked in tandem with that. It’s an excerpt from her forthcoming book You Sound Like a White Girl: The Case for Rejecting Assimilation (out March 22), and believe me when I say I felt that when I read it. There’s still a misperception among U.S. Anglos—and some Latinxs—that racism and colorism does not exist among Latinxs (and it’s a perception that some Latin Americans are happy to perpetuate). But of course, one look at the mostly pale palette of Univision and Telemundo hosts shows how wrong that is. I’m so glad Arce wrote about this important topic, and how we should resist the insidious ways colonialism affects the world.

Before that, though, some news!

—Julianne Escobedo Shepherd

WHAT'S GOING ON 

• Russia bombed the Donestk Regional Drama Theatre in Mariupol, Ukraine, where over 1300 civilians were sheltering. Around 130 people have been rescued but the majority are still trapped beneath the rubble. Before the bombing, Ukrainians had painted the Russian word for “children” in two visible places around the theater to warn troops, according to Reuters.

• Brittany Griner, the WNBA star who was detained at a Russian airport for allegedly carrying cannabis oil in her suitcase, will be held there at least until May 15 as Russian authorities conduct an investigation. While she has an attorney and the U.S. State Department is “doing everything we can” to support her, the outlook is grim considering Russia’s track history with imprisoning foreign nationals, plus the diplomatic fallout from the war on Ukraine. And while some have noted that Griner’s situation hasn’t garnered enough media coverage, there’s a reason for this: the State Department, WNBA, and her family have deliberately withheld details from the public in the interest of negotiating her release. “Everyone’s getting the strategy of ‘say less and push more privately behind the scenes,’ ” WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert told the AP.

• Here's a beautiful Instagram post (and caption) from Cherokee playwright and lawyer Mary Katherine Nagle: “Today the United States restored tribal jurisdiction and sovereignty over non-Indian perpetrated crimes of child abuse, trafficking, stranger sexual assault, and much more. And Indian Country was there to witness the United States wake up to history!” Which is to say: The Violence Against Women Act has been updated to (finally) include indigenous women, giving Tribal Courts the ability to arrest, try, and sentence non-Natives who perpetrate violence against tribal members. It's a true win, and a step towards justice for the astronomical amounts of missing and murdered Indigenous women in the U.S. Native women are victims of domestic violence and physical assault at a rate of 50% more than any other group, and murder is the third leading cause of death for Native women, with the majority of perpetrators non-Native, and until now there has been little recourse.

• Lia Thomas, the U Penn swimmer who is enraging transphobes for being good at her job, has won the NCAA Division I national championship. This makes her the first known trans athlete to win that title in any sport. Hell yeah, Lia! Detractors should take some advice from one of her competitors, Lexi Cuomo, a champion swimmer at the University of Virginia: “Any hate is unnecessary,” she told ESPN. “We’re focused on ourselves and our team. Our first and foremost goal is to win a national title.”

• Angelina Jolie, who is just like all of us in that she has a day job for money so she can spend the rest of her time doing things she actually cares about, recently visited Yemen to raise awareness of the refugee crisis there—an important effort at any time, but especially prudent at a moment when the world seems to be waking up to the disparate treatment of refugees who are not white Europeans. As part of a UN Refugee Agency's effort to raise $4.3 billion in humanitarian aid, Jolie met with locals, including children, suffering from food scarcity and other instabilities after seven years of war, and addressed a panel of humanitarians and aid workers. “The lack of solutions to conflict and insecurity globally is causing unmanageable levels of human displacement and need,” she told the panel. "You have an opportunity as governments to address this desperate human emergency and to seek an urgent end to the conflict.” If you’d like to donate to this important cause, you can do so here.

AND:

• The Black women lining up to defend Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

• Loving this conversation with the queer ranchera artist San Cha (And bumping “Oveja Negra”)

• “The feminist campaigner telling the stories of murdered women” in the UK

• The CROWN Act, which would ban race-based hair discrimination in the U.S., has passed the House. Onto the Senate!

• Now playing: Rosalía’s new album MOTOMAMI. “I just want to hear something I haven’t heard before. That’s the intention always,” the inventive Catalan singer told the New York Times this week. (And, cough, if you’d like to read my review, it’s here.)

—JES

MUST-READ 

Julissa Arce On How Latinx Communities Have Been “Tricked Into Yearning for Whiteness”  

JULISSA ARCE, MATCHING HER LOOK TO HER BOOK. (PHOTO BY ARAYA DOHENY/GETTY IMAGES FOR PODERISTAS)

I was in middle school the first time someone told me, “You talk white.” It was an off-hand comment from a peer who wasn’t aware of all the implications behind that phrase, but I thought about it for a long time. I went through all of high school codeswitching between the jargon and cadence my friends used—peppering words like “brick,” “deadass,” and all types of Spanish slang into every other sentence—and the educated verbiage my mother expected of someone she was sending to private school. It wasn’t until college, surrounded by actual white people, that I realized my well-practiced, NPR-esque accent wasn’t fooling anyone. I was still “talking white” and yet it didn’t bring me any closer to my white classmates—one of whom would go on to write racial slurs on the door of my dorm room. 

In her new memoir, You Sound Like a White Girl: The Case for Rejecting Assimilation, author and activist Julissa Arce shares her own experience of trying to squeeze herself into the box of whiteness, a box formed both by white supremacy in American culture and anti-Indigenous sentiments in Mexican culture. 

The book is a moving, infuriating, and at times funny overview of the ways Arce, like many Latinxs, was taught to see whiteness as aspirational; an idea that was reinforced by her time working at Goldman Sachs as an undocumented immigrant. But it wasn’t just the talks about Aspen and summer homes that made Arce second-guess herself, it was also the colonizer mentality of those closest to her, the ones who praised her European features and ignored her Indigenous heritage. (You know the ones, the “pelo malo, pelo bueno” tías.) 

Below is an excerpt from Arce’s book—just the tip of the iceberg in her touching and well-argued case for rejecting assimilation, no matter how alluring it might seem.

—Shannon Melero

IMAGE COURTESY OF FLATIRON BOOKS 

My nephew, a junior in high school in Mexico, was visiting me in Los Angeles a couple of years ago when I asked him if he knew that Vicente Guerrero, the second president of Mexico, was Black. “Are you serious?” he said. “In all the pictures he looks ‘bien blanquito.’” Because of his stature, he could not be ignored or erased from history, but his standing didn’t stop him from being whitewashed. Even when negating the history and importance of Indigenous and Black people simply can’t be done, we are not allowed to claim power alongside our Indigenous or Black identities—the identity must then be erased. This strategy is deployed from Mexico to the Dominican Republic to Europe.

Vicente Guerrero was the son of a Black father and an Indigenous mother. Inspired by the Haitian Revolution, Guerrero fought to end African slavery in Mexico some thirty years before it was abolished in the United States. Schools all over Mexico bear his name. It’s tragic to think that our people in Mexico died to gain independence, freedom, and equality for the Indigenous worker and for the enslaved African, but many haven’t been able to shake the colonizer in our heads. A document of twenty-three principles for the future of a free Mexico, called the Sentimientos de la Nación written by José María Morelos Pérez y Pavón in 1813, included the prohibition of slavery “forever,” as well as the abandoning of the caste system, and only “vice and virtue” making people different from one another. When John Quincy Adams was secretary of state, he wrote a letter to his brother in 1818 in which he described America’s independence as “a War of freemen, for political Independence,” and Mexico’s as “a War of Slaves against their masters.” Adams was right that Mexico’s independence—as well as the independence of other Latin American and Caribbean countries—was different. The independence of the United States was one where elites sought liberty only for themselves and for the protection of their land and property, which included African people. Mexicans won our independence from Spain to free the most oppressed, even if it hasn’t played out that way.

We’ve been so beaten down by white supremacy that we have yet to be truly free. Whiteness infiltrates Mexican institutions and life just as it does those of its neighbor to the north. It is a problem that plagues much of Latin America. In Bolivia, for example, the first and only Indigenous president came to power in 2006, 181 years after the county’s independence. Colombians have taken to the streets to protest racist police, because Black people are killed more often there, too. From Brazil to Mexico, Indigenous and Black people remain oppressed.

We’ve been so beaten down by white supremacy that we have yet to be truly free

When I go back to Mexico now, I am deeply saddened to hear the same everyday racist talk I heard when I was a kid. I often wonder if I had stayed in Mexico, would I see clearly how we’ve been tricked to yearn for whiteness so that we don’t strive for justice?

I often think of a brilliant line by author Domingo Martinez when I grapple with our own people becoming the oppressor when they’ve known the scourge of whiteness: “There is nothing more potentially hostile than the indigenous ego interpreting the laws of his conqueror upon his own people.” We become vicious to our own bodies, to our own souls. In our own home countries, we learn to view white as superior, as something we should aspire to. Then when we immigrate to the United States, we bring those sentiments packed in our suitcases. Those ideas are hardened on our hearts like a wax seal the minute we cross into the United States.

Mexico introduced me to the lies of whiteness, but it was the United States that taught me just how corrosive white supremacy truly is. Seeking whiteness is a matter of survival here: white skin in the United States means you exist. It means you matter. Some of us flatter ourselves white by virtue of our education, our job, or our bank account—despite the nopal on our faces, we introduce ourselves as “Spanish” at work. In the United States, whiteness didn’t just render me less than—it rendered me invisible. Here a Brown Mexican seems to have no past, no future, and no identity. I was further ostracized because I was undocumented. It was the ultimate layer of being alien. But here, in my new home, is also where I learned to fight it.

It's fun to perrear sola but newsletters are always better with friends. Share this one with yours! 

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

Special announcement for you on this lovely Wednesday: the weather is nice! Or at least it is where I live. Yesterday was also quite nice—I went roller skating and I could feel the snakeskin of seasonal depression slipping off my body. I hope the sun is shining just as bright in your corner of the world.

In alignment with the mood-boosting weather, today Paola Mendoza reports from her native Colombia on last weekend’s presidential primary and the shifting tides in Latin America. I can’t remember the last time I was so pumped about a presidential candidate, but Mendoza’s hope for the future of Colombia and their potential next vice president gave me chills–and I know it’s not from the cold because as I cannot say enough, the weather is good.

Also on the agenda today: a better way for your boss to celebrate Equal Pay Day. Do you feel fairly paid or is your job just sucking your life force and paying you in Starbucks gift cards? Let us know at [email protected]!

But first, let’s check in on the rest of the world.

 —Shannon Melero

WHAT'S GOING ON

• On Wednesday morning, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky virtually addressed the US Congress and requested the country’s help to stop Russian attacks. Some specific asks were a no-fly zone over Ukraine, increased military and humanitarian aid, and a new “union of responsible countries” tasked with stopping these kinds of conflicts immediately. Zelenskyy also called on President Joe Biden to be a “leader of peace.”

• Peace, whatever that will look like, is allegedly close at hand. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov suggested that a “compromise” was in sight between Ukraine and Russia, which could see Kyiv deemed a neutral zone. President Zelensky says that the compromises being discussed in peace talks are becoming more realistic, but he still cautions patience.

• One year ago today, eight people were killed during a shooting at Young’s Asian Massage in Acworth, Georgia. In the last year, hate crimes against Asian people have increased over 300% partly due to misinformation over the coronavirus. If you’re in New York City tonight,  Wednesday, consider joining Governor Kathy Hochul, author Min Jin Lee, Asian American Federation founder Jo-Ann Yoo, and many others at the Justice for Asian Women rally in Times Square. It starts at 5 p.m. If you can't make it in person, consider sending a donation to the AAF’s Hope Against Hate project here.

  AND:

• Congress is getting rid of Daylight Savings and I’m trying to think of a more useless thing that they could have done to avoid their actual jobs. Doesn’t anyone want to work!?

• Mass graves have been located in Syria, which may provide evidence of war crimes carried out by Bashar al-Assad’s government.

• Jane Campion done fucked up. But she’s sorry.

• Anyone else thinking of student loans again, now that we’re two months away from turning them back on? 

• Con-woman Anna Sorokin does not have time for deportation.

THERE'S STILL HOPE IN POLITICS

I Believe in Francia

How it felt voting for Colombia’s most progressive political candidate in years 

BY PAOLA MENDOZA

FRANCIA MÁRQUEZ CELEBRATING A HISTORIC NIGHT WITH GUSTAVO PETRO (PHOTO BY DARWIN TORRES) 

Last week, I boarded a plane and flew 2,486 miles from my home in New York City to Bogotá, Colombia, the city where I was born. I went there to vote in the Presidential primary elections—not just for any candidate, but for Francia Márquez.

Voting for Francia means voting for a Colombia that centers the most vulnerable, the most in need, those who have suffered at the hands of corrupt politicians, the 52-year civil war, and generational poverty. On election night, she looked into the cameras that surrounded her and spoke to the Colombian people. “I acknowledge the nobodies,” she said, “the nobodies of Colombia, those from the mountains, plains and neighborhoods of this country who accompanied us.”

Francia is one of those “nobodies” she was talking to on election night. She is an Afro-Colombian woman who was born in Yolombó—a small village where she grew up working in artisanal gold mining. Her activism began at 14, when she organized her community against the construction of a dam that would have dramatically altered the way of life for her people. Francia lost that battle but she refused to stop fighting for her community and her land. In 2014, she led a group of at least 80 women in a 350-kilometer march to the capitol to protest illegal gold mining. In 2018 she won the “Nobel Prize of environmentalism”—the Goldman Prize—for her work. Her activism has come at great personal cost. Colombia is one of the deadliest places on earth to be an environmental activist and in 2019 Francia survived an assassination attempt. 

Two years later, she launched her presidential campaign. Initially, the political establishment, the wealthy, and even some of her own community wrote her off—they said she was just an activist, she’d never held public office, she didn’t have experience. She’s also young (now 40), became a single mom as a teenager, and is the first Afro-Colombian woman to run for President. Everyone thought these qualities were a detriment; Francia believed they were exactly why she should be President. Last year I interviewed Francia for The Meteor and asked her what she would say to people who criticized her lack of experience. “The experience white men have has not allowed my family to live in dignity,” she told me. “Or my people. Or this country. So what experience are they talking about?... The experience that allows these powerful men to use violence against their own people and kill them?... Well, that experience I don’t want to learn.”

This was the reason I flew to my homeland to vote for Francia. I left Colombia when I was just three years old, but I have always had a strong connection to it—my mom would send me back to live with my grandmother for the summers so she could work in the United States. When I was 14, I came back to live in Colombia for three years—three years that saved my life, that allowed me to connect with my people and my history, that provided me safety and security when I was at my most vulnerable. I owe such a debt of gratitude to this country. The least I can do is participate in building a better future for all Colombians—and so I always return to vote.

“The experience white men have has not allowed my family to live in dignity”

Election day was warm and sunny in Bogotá. There were streams and streams of people walking into the convention center on the Sunday my cousin and I went to vote. I showed security my cedula (Colombian ID), and off I went to find table 99. The beautiful thing about voting in Colombia is that you don’t have to be registered to vote, which is what should happen here in the U.S.—if you’re 18, the legal voting age, you can vote. And unlike the U.S., there are pictures of all the candidates, and you simply mark an X over the person’s face. It was thrilling to put my X over Francia’s picture—a historic moment for her, and for the whole country.

When the votes were tabulated that night, the leading candidate in Francia’s party, Gustavo Petro, got over four million votes, and she received 781,865, which is a lot in Colombia. It is an extraordinary feat that Francia Márquez came in third place behind Petro and Federico Gutiérrez, a right-wing candidate; she had more votes than three-time presidential candidate and former mayor of Medellín, Sergio Fajardo, and beat a handful of other well-known men from the political establishment. The headline of the night was that Francia dominated—and a new political force was born in Colombia. If she is selected as Gustavo Petro’s vice presidential candidate and if they win in May, she would be the first Black woman VP in our country’s history. And regardless, I believe Francia is on her way to one day being La Presidenta of Colombia.

ELECTION DAY IN COLOMBIA. WHO DO YOU THINK SHE VOTED FOR? (PHOTO BY DARWIN TORRES)

That’s the celebration for me: that Francia continues to show the power of the Afro-Colombian and Indigenous communities in a country that excludes and abuses them; the strength of feminism; and the audacity of being unabashedly progressive, pro-choice, and pro-environment in everything she fights for. She is a political candidate for the future of this country.

Isn’t this what’s needed everywhere? Our world feels like it’s collapsing—we’re still in the throes of a pandemic, we’re on the verge of a massive war, it’s scary and it’s exhausting. I don’t want the same leadership. I want something different. I want women’s leadership—progressive women’s leadership. And it is Latin America that is showing the world how this is done.

In the U.S., rights are being taken away from so many people, and the rise of the white conservative woman is aiding and abetting that. But in Latin America, Honduras just elected its first female president, Xiomara Castro, who’s a socialist; Chile recently elected its youngest President, Gabriel Boric, who ran on a feminist socialist platform; and feminist values are sweeping Latin America with the Green Wave movement for reproductive rights. So often in the U.S., we don’t look to others—we think we know more than everyone else in the world. But right now, we need to look to the south for a roadmap.

I look to Francia.

WERK

Does Your Job Deserve You?

Before you go... let's chat Equal Pay Day

This week marked Equal Pay Day, the day when women (on average) famously have to work each year to make what men made the year before. For Black women specifically, the day doesn’t roll around till September 21; for Latinx women, it’s practically a whole year later, on December freaking 8! Years ago, I worked for a wonderful feminist boss who christened that day National Go Ask For a Raise Day (I did), and that’s always a good way to spend the holiday, but… what if we didn’t have to spend so much time advocating for and improving ourselves at work?

Last week I went to a book event for Reshma Saujani, author of the new book Pay Up: The Future of Women and Work, and Daisy Auger-Dominguez, author of Inclusion Revolution. And the thing that got the most applause in the room was when they both told the audience to just stop trying to be better. “I don’t want to hear another word about mentoring, or how to get over imposter syndrome, or how to work ‘harder faster,’” said Reshma. “We’re already showing up overqualified. They need to deserve us.”

I’ve got nothing against work advice for women; I’ve given it, taken it, and do office hours on Sunday afternoons with folks interested in media (DM me). But as Reshma noted, half the time women already have more skills and qualifications than the job requires; what’s missing is a workplace that’s worthy of us—with paid leave and child care to accommodate our lives. (The pay gap increases sharply, especially for women of color, when you have a child or take on other caregiving responsibilities.)

All this is no surprise—it’s part of what’s fueling the Great Resignation. But in a week where billionaires told us to pull up our bootstraps, it’s a good reminder. Maybe your boss (and your Senator) should take that leadership course instead.

—Cindi Leive

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

Bonjour Meteor readers! I am feeling mildly upbeat today—despite, you know, everything—thanks to the good folks at The Dan Lebatard Show, who literally created an entire musical about the Super Bowl. I had my doubts at first, but the whole soundtrack is Rock of Ages meets Chicago meets Rent. Give it a spin, and thank me later for the serotonin boost.

And it’s a boost you will appreciate after today’s newsletter, which is a deep dive into the anti-trans legislation in Texas and how Republicans are using the bogeyman of forced sterilization to defend their stance. If you thought you were mad about it before, just wait until you get the full context from historians Dr. Lauren Jae Gutterman and Dr. Gillian Frank.

But first, let’s check in on the news.

 —Shannon Melero

WHAT'S GOING ON

• The Biden administration announced on Friday the suspension of all normal trade with Russia, falling in step with several G7 nations hitting Russia with heavy tariffs and sanctions. What does this mean in the short term for Americans? Gas prices won’t be going down any time soon, and the import of Russian-made products into the US will likely slow if not halt altogether. Congress also approved a spending bill that includes $13.6 billion in aid for Ukraine.

• Also in that new $1.5 trillion spending bill sliding across Biden’s desk this weekend: increases to the defense budget and $602 million going to the Capitol Police; not to be an annoying bill-splitter, but I did not order that and do not want to pay for it. There is also more money earmarked for child nutrition and care but the exact dollar amounts are still unclear.  Missing from this new budget is “$15 billion in additional COVID-related funding,” which Nancy Pelosi blamed on the Republicans. Nancy, girl, at some point we need to have a talk about accountability.

• The fuckery is already coming for Supreme Court Justice nominee Ketanji Jackson Brown. Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee are grasping for straws gearing up to cast doubt on Jackson’s Brown impartiality on an upcoming case about the role race plays in college admissions. The belief is that she should recuse herself from the case when she makes it to the Big Bench, and Republican committee members plan to grill her over her role on Harvard’s Board of Overseers should she not clearly state her intention to step back from the case. Funny how they have this energy for one woman’s professional affiliations but not another’s.

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, BOOKED, BLESSED, AND UNBOTHERED (PHOTO BY ANNA MONEYMAKER VIA GETTY IMAGES)

• The ACLU announced Friday that its lawsuit against Texas’s six-week abortion ban cannot proceed after a ruling from the Supreme Court. People in Texas have now been living in a pre-Roe world since September. The English language does not have the words to express how big this loss feels.

  AND:

• Extremely famous and recognizable director Ryan Coogler was detained after entering Bank of America and trying to withdraw money from his own checking account. Coogler was “mistaken” for a bank robber after handing over a withdrawal slip with a note asking the teller to do the count discreetly.

• Disney employees are outing the Mouse House for “censoring same-sex affections” in Pixar films. Look, if you want to lose the revenue that comes from the very dedicated Disney Gays be my guest, but it’s y’all’s funeral not mine. Just let the cartoons kiss.

• A man who blamed feminism for low birth rates has just been voted president of South Korea. President-Elect Yoon Suk-yeol is also trying to abolish the government’s gender equality ministry.

• Local dumbass posts internet rant.

• One of the most beautiful places in the world is on the brink of destruction

• These women in Karachi “wish to see a feminist utopia” of their own

THE FIGHT FOR TRANS LIVES 

The Reproductive Ideology Behind Texas’s Attack On Trans Kids

Ken Paxton is abusing the history of forced sterilization

BY LAUREN JAE GUTTERMAN AND GILLIAN FRANK

KEN PAXTON, TERRORIZER OF CHILDREN. (PHOTO BY DREW ANGERER VIA GETTY IMAGES) 

Over the past few weeks, the nation has witnessed an onslaught of attempts to ban gender-affirming treatment for minors. It’s been a competition to see who can go the furthest and be the cruelest: First, Texas Governor Greg Abbott directed the state’s child welfare agency to categorize gender-affirming care as “child abuse.” Then, lawmakers in the Idaho House voted to make such treatment a felony, with medical providers and parents looking at life in prison. And in Alabama, a similar bill, House Bill 266, would also force teachers and school counselors to out trans students to their parents.

It’s all horrific. But as historians of sexuality, we are especially disturbed by lawmakers’ repeated invocation of the ugly history of forced sterilization to justify their anti-trans campaigns. It’s an attempt to cloak their cruelty in pseudo-feminist language—and it’s completely disingenuous.

The forced sterilization connection was made most explicit by indicted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in his statement against gender-affirming care for minors. “Historically weaponized against minorities, sterilization procedures have harmed many vulnerable populations, such as African Americans, female minors, the disabled, and others,” Paxton’s opinion reads. Then he delivers the ideological punchline, poached from the language of the reproductive justice movement: “These violations,” he claims, “have been found to infringe upon the fundamental human right to procreate.”

These bans are about making reproductive anatomy into social destiny

Contrary to Paxton’s argument, irreversible surgical procedures are rarely, if ever, performed on youth under age 18. And the other, much more common gender-affirming medical treatments that these bans criminalize—such as puberty-blocking drugs and hormonal therapy—do not cause sterilization. They are also supported by the leading medical associations in the United States and proven to lower teens’ risk of suicide and depression.

In the arguments lawmakers have made against trans kids’ participation in sports, legislators have demonized trans girls in particular, alleging that they have an unfair advantage against their cisgender peers. Similar bans on trans student-athletes have been enacted in 10 other states. But when it comes to gender-affirming care, instead of portraying trans children as threatening, Republicans have cast them as victims of their caregivers and medical providers.

And in order to do it, they’re appropriating reproductive justice language—even though the actual history of reproductive justice affirms, rather than denies, the right to bodily autonomy for all people. The predominantly Black and brown women activists who have been drawing attention to forced sterilization in the United States since the 1960s haven’t simply been fighting for the freedom to reproduce. Rather, they’ve been fighting for the freedom to determine their own reproductive lives—to govern their own bodies. As the Committee for Abortion Rights and Against Sterilization Abuse wrote in 1979, “Policies that restrict women’s right to have and raise children—through forced sterilization or the denial of adequate welfare benefits—are directly related to policies that compel women to have children, on the view that this is their primary human function. Both kinds of policies constitute reproduction control by the state.”

READ THE SIGN, LIVE THE SIGN (PHOTO BY DREW ANGERER VIA GETTY IMAGES)

In one well-known case of that era, Relf v. Weinberger (1974), the Southern Poverty Law Center filed suit on behalf of two Black sisters, Minnie Lee and Mary Alice Relf, aged 14 and 12, who had been sterilized at a federally-funded Family Planning Clinic in Montgomery, Alabama. The girls were operated on without their parents’ knowledge or consent; a nurse told their mother only that they were going to receive “some shots.” Minnie Lee, Mary Alice, and so many others were targeted for sterilization because state caseworkers and clinic staff deemed them, based on their race, class, and perceived mental ability, as undesirable citizens—“unfit.”

It is galling that Texas Attorney General Paxton cites Relf v. Weinberger as a precedent for his attack on trans teens, claiming that trans-affirming health care is equivalent to the compulsory sterilization of uninformed minors. However, the invocation of this history misses the main lessons of Relf: the need for informed consent and reproductive choice. The plaintiffs in Relf were not opposed to sterilization as a whole.

What they objected to was the authorization of “involuntary sterilizations, without statutory or constitutional justification,” at a moment when millions of Americans sought out sterilization as a form of birth control, and many women who begged doctors for the procedure were denied. Well into the 1970s, in fact, many physicians followed the “Rule of 120,” a recommendation of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, which withheld sterilizations from women whose number of children multiplied by her age was less than 120. Whether the case was coerced or refused sterilizations, at issue was a question of bodily autonomy.

So why is the Texas Attorney General deploying the language of sterilization, child protection, and reproductive freedom? Like Senate Bill 8, the state’s recent legislation banning abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, it’s all about making reproductive anatomy into social destiny; from this perspective, anything that threatens to medically interrupt procreation is viewed as harmful. In the name of making children one day have children, Republican leaders in Texas are willing to stomp on the health of trans kids and the reproductive freedom of abortion-seekers.

Right now, trans youth and those who love them are rightly terrified; multiple families are under state investigation. Using the legacy of human rights abuses against the Relf sisters and so many others to justify these human rights abuses is simply unconscionable. As 11-year-old Austin trans activist Kai Shappley has told the Texas leaders behind these recent attacks, “Just stop.”

BEFORE YOU GO

“Carbon Footprint” Was Bullshit This Entire Time???

BY JULIANNE ESCOBEDO SHEPHERD

If you’ve ever wondered what your carbon footprint is, and how to reduce it, here’s some illuminating information that you may not already know. On this week’s edition of UNDISTRACTED, climate journalist Mary Annaïse Heglar told Brittany Packnett Cunningham that the idea of one’s individual “carbon footprint” is a big load of garbage invented by BP, the megalithic oil and gas corporation. More specifically, she explains: “BP created the concept of a carbon footprint to … shift the responsibility for the climate crisis to the consumer that they are selling the oil and gas to.” And when companies like BP calculate their own footprints, “they don’t count the oil they sell to everyone else…So their carbon footprint is so much bigger than they even take credit for.”

I echo Ms. Heglar’s sentiment that this is “some real evil shit.” To hear it with your own ears, as well as learn more about how the West’s dependence on Russian oil helped make that genocidal oligarchy so powerful, listen here. You'll also learn about what you can do to keep the heat on the fossil fuel companies—and the governments who enable them.

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

Hello, precious Meteor readers. I hope you’re taking care of yourselves—don’t be like me and immediately decide to doomscroll when you can’t sleep at 4 a.m. (Do NOT do it!) Events both domestically and abroad are grim, and many of us are feeling helpless and stressed, but we all need to keep our heads up in order to keep going. Instead, try sending some cold hard cash to the Trans Justice Funding Project, or this GoFundMe for Black people fleeing Ukraine, or the Missouri Abortion Fund. An objectively better thing to do than open Twitter before dawn!

In today’s newsletter, Tracy Clark-Flory looks at the misogynist legacy of the celebrity sex tape through the lens of Hulu’s Pam and Tommy—and how the violation of a woman’s privacy is almost always the point. After that, Shannon Melero speaks to attorney Carrie Goldberg about how the law protects—and doesn’t protect—victims of revenge porn today.

But first! The news!

—Julianne Escobedo Shepherd

WHAT'S GOING ON

• Civilian deaths are mounting in Ukraine; the Kyiv Independent reports that a maternity and children’s hospital was destroyed by Russian bombs Wednesday morning, and that agreed-upon humanitarian corridors are continually being violated by Russian forces, preventing civilians from fleeing to safety. The International Court of Justice is “fast-tracking” its decision on whether to demand an immediate ceasefire, which is basically unenforceable but would further damage Russia’s diplomatic status.

• The U.S. State Department has been working behind the scenes for weeks to free WNBA superstar Brittney Griner, who was detained in Russia for allegedly transporting vape cartridges containing hashish oil. Of course, if the WNBA didn’t skimp on revenue sharing with its players, she might never have been there to begin with.

• Meanwhile: Russian restaurants in New York City are being vandalized despite several of them being owned by Ukrainians; salad dressing, poutine and Moscow Mules are being renamed; and Russian cats have been banned from competing in the Fédération Internationale Féline, an international cat federation. Folks… let’s not Freedom Fries this situation, please. We can oppose the genocidal machinations of Moscow without demonizing individual Russians, particularly those who are desperate to escape Putin’s regime.

• SCOTUS has rejected an attempt to put Bill Cosby back behind bars for drugging and sexually assaulting Andrea Constand, a conviction which was overturned last year on a technicality. “I really felt they were setting a predator loose and that made me sick,” Constand told the Times upon Cosby’s release.

• The Washington Post reported this week that Nadima Noor, a Canadian-Afghan women’s rights activist who runs a humanitarian organization in Kabul, was arrested at gunpoint by the Taliban in February. (Read our interview with journalists reporting on similar Taliban violence here.)

• Florida passed the “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law, which prohibits teachers from discussing the existence of LGBTQ+ people in classrooms (at the detriment of… LGBTQ+ kids in classrooms). Idaho passed a bill criminalizing gender-affirming care for trans youth. The largest children’s hospital in Texas—and the country—has stopped offering gender-affirming care for trans kids, supposedly to protect providers and families from Governor Greg Abbott’s decree that demands parents of trans kids be reported for “child abuse.” As ACLU attorney Chase Strangio told Democracy Now!, this is a “national, well-funded effort to attack and eradicate trans youth and trans lives.”

• A Republican representative in Missouri has proposed a law that would deputize citizens to sue any Missouri resident who leaves the state to obtain an abortion, based in part on the vigilanteism allowed in Texas’s anti-abortion laws. It’s likely unconstitutional for now, but as Professor Tressie McMillan Cottom alluded—so was what they did to Dred Scott.

AND: 

• Apayauq Reitan, a dog musher from Alaska’s Inupiat tribe, will be the first trans woman to compete in the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race. “No matter what your interests are, you can transition and keep doing the things that you want to do,” she told Indian Country Today. “You don’t have to change your whole, entire life if you don’t want to.”

• How skateboarding is empowering young Palestinians

• The writer Huda Hassan has published an excellent interview with the Combahee River Collective’s Barbara Smith, centered on the way the group brought awareness to several unsolved murders of Black women in Boston in the late ’70s and “provided a bridge during a time of incredible crisis.”

• I, too, am trying to “embrace my inner hag!”

• There’s a new scripted comedy called Minx, about the first erotic magazine for women—not a true story, but based on history, and apparently about to join Euphoria in its liberal use of full-frontal male nudity. Cheers to righting a true disparity.

REVENGE PORN AND OTHER CRIMES

Sex Tapes Really Aren’t About Sex

Hulu’s Pam & Tommy is a reminder of the many ways we treat women’s pain as entertainment

BY TRACY CLARK-FLORY

PAMELA ANDERSON AND TOMMY LEE, 1995 (PHOTO BY S. GRANITZ/WIREIMAGE)

This week brought the finale of Hulu’s Pam & Tommy, a limited-series dramedy about the leak of a private sex tape that none of us should know anything about. We’re talking eight whole episodes reenacting the ’90s-era theft and viral spread of an explicit home movie starring celebrities Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee. That’s more than five hours of television devoted to replaying a privacy violation.

The tape’s leak in 1995 was paradigm-shifting and emblematic of a cultural moment, so it’s possible to imagine a worthwhile critical retrospective. Instead, Pam & Tommy is less a reconsideration of the leak than a nostalgic reliving of it. It’s less about the tape than of the tape, which ushered in an ongoing era of stolen moments treated as entertainment.

Anderson and Lee’s video was historic as the first celebrity sex tape, spawning dozens of direct imitations, but also setting the stage for whole new privacy violations, like the 2014 hack targeting famous women’s nudes (a.k.a “The Fappening”). The tape’s leak teed up an explosion of nonconsensual entertainment online—and not just starring celebrities. Soon, everyday women had to reckon with the public humiliation of everything from “upskirting” videos to “revenge porn.” Fast forward over two decades and the majority of states have had to legally address nonconsensual pornography (or nonconsensual image abuse, as some experts now call it). The next challenging legal frontier: “deepfake porn,” where a person’s face is seamlessly swapped onto pornographic material.

We’re living in a cultural moment of re-evaluation around the sexism of the ‘90s and ‘00s, which no doubt helped greenlight Pam & Tommy

But let’s be clear: leaked sex tapes aren’t really about sex. The most famous ones—as with Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian—are defined by entitlement, trespass, violation, and embarrassment, vis-à-vis a woman. This is a fundamental part of the attraction: these videos provide forbidden access. Kevin Blatt, a self-described celebrity sex tape broker, says the appeal is seeing something you “weren’t supposed to see.” Even when there are questions about a sex tape being leaked for fame and publicity, there’s still the suspension of disbelief that allows viewers the fantasy of crossing boundaries, of getting what is not freely given. The entire meaning of the tape changes if a woman intentionally and openly participates in its creation and release.

Pam & Tommy itself adds another layer of non-consent to the original violation of the tape’s leak: Anderson wanted nothing to do with the series. (While Lee has voiced support for Pam & Tommy, Anderson reportedly finds its release “very painful.”) The show was made anyway—and then promoted as “feminist” for being sympathetic to her experience.

In reality, the show identifies at the start with Rand Gauthier (Seth Rogen), the contractor who stole the tape after remodeling the couple’s mansion. We’re given a comedic, rollicking justification for the theft: Tommy Lee (Sebastian Stan) is an over-the-top asshole clad in a banana hammock who barks unreasonable orders at Rand. These early episodes are driven by laughs—take the scene where Tommy has a conversation with his own penis, which talks back via cringey animation.

We’re living in a cultural moment of re-evaluation around the sexism of the ’90s and ’00s, which no doubt helped greenlight Pam & Tommy, but the show’s true impulse is to laugh and wax nostalgic.

Let's be clear: leaked sex tapes aren’t really about sex

The series does eventually get around to inviting identification with Pam (Lily James), instead of literal and figurative dicks. It depicts Pam’s struggle to be taken seriously as an actor as her Baywatch lines are cut to prioritize zoomed-in shots of her butt. After the sex tape is leaked, Pam & Tommy spotlights her pain, portraying Pam as having a devastating miscarriage amid the stress of the violation. The series feels like an unintentional meta-commentary on the many ways we are entitled to, and entertained by, women’s pain—not just with leaked sex tapes but also with limited-run TV series dramatizing leaked sex tapes.

Eventually, Anderson is shown in a brutal and shaming deposition for her lawsuit against Penthouse’s Bob Guccione, as she tries to stop the magazine from publishing stills from the tape. She is cross-examined about her sex life and even forced to watch parts of the tape in a room packed with men. We’re meant to feel outraged, but that outrage arrives after Pam & Tommy has already had its giddy fun.

LILY JAMES AS PAMELA ANDERSON DURING HER DEPOSITION. (SCREENSHOT VIA HULU/ANNAPURNA)

The tone-deafness of the first half of the series is only matched by the inappropriateness of its handling of partner violence. Though it’s not depicted in the series, Lee was sentenced in 1998 to six months in jail for felony spousal abuse following an incident in which Anderson accused him of kicking her while she held her 7-week-old son; she had “a broken fingernail and red marks on her back,” according to police.

The series portrays several early red flags in the relationship—like Tommy calling Pam non-stop and following her uninvited on a trip to Mexico—but treats them as fun material. Pam & Tommy leaves Lee’s arrest, and their divorce, as a literal postscript at the end of the series. It’s a sanitized version of events, referring only to “a physical fight in the couple’s kitchen.” Hulu has cheekily promoted the show as “the greatest love story ever sold.”

All these years later, it’s tempting to believe that we have enough perspective to critically revisit this long-ago sex tape leak and other misogynies of yore. Instead, the last two decades have created a convenient new cover for exploitation: Pam & Tommy delights in replaying the violation, only to abruptly pivot toward superficial wokeness. It makes claims of a redemptive narrative while risking retraumatizing one of its subjects. Ultimately, the show is an accidental testament to the many ways women’s suffering is consumed as entertainment.

You can call it “reflection,” but we’re not nearly as far away from these events as we might like to think.

ASK A LAWYER

Does the Law Do Enough to Protect Victims of Revenge Porn?

BY SHANNON MELERO

CARRIE GOLDBERG (PHOTO BY CRAIG BARRITT VIA GETTY IMAGES FOR GLAMOUR)

Decades after Pamela Anderson unwillingly introduced the broader public to the concept of revenge porn, has the law gotten any better at protecting victims? I asked lawyer and author Carrie Goldberg—owner of victims’ rights law firm C.A.Goldberg, PLLC.

What are some of the barriers to trying revenge porn cases? Is it particularly difficult to prove guilt/intent?

Carrie Goldberg: All states have criminal laws that make it illegal to film or record somebody without their consent in places—the bedroom, bathroom, changing room—where the person has the expectation of privacy. These laws are usually called video voyeurism or unlawful surveillance….And 48 states now have laws that criminalize the nonconsensual publishing of intimate images and videos.

The problem is that it’s up to law enforcement to decide when to prosecute. Unfortunately, crimes that predominantly impact women and girls—like sexual assault, revenge porn, and intimate partner violence—are notoriously under-prosecuted. One reason that law enforcers don’t prosecute is that many criminal laws require proof of the offender’s motive and, specifically, a showing that the motive was to harass or abuse the victim. But we know from working with victims that [predators can have] a range of other motives such as money, clout, boredom, or entertainment.

About a dozen states also have civil remedies for victims. In other words, a victim can sue their offender…[But] suing never resolves what is often a victim’s main priority—getting that material the hell off the internet.

The internet, as they say, is forever. So what happens to victims who [do pursue criminal charges] over materials uploaded online? Does the law offer any assurances that those images will be removed, and if so, whose responsibility is it to remove them?

There is no legal fix for getting pictures off the internet. Criminal cases have the goal of punishing the offender, while civil cases have the goal of “making the victim whole” through financial recovery. But, there is federal law, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which has been interpreted by our courts to shield platforms (i.e. Instagram, Facebook, YouTube) from any responsibility for material that users post.

It really falls on the victim to try to use things like copyright law and appeal to the goodwill of websites and social media companies and to be persistently searching the internet for material.

What needs to change to better protect victims?

The current laws are not adequate….While we’ve made so much progress in the last decade with getting new laws, we still need federal law. In honor of International Women’s Day, several lawmakers reintroduced the Stopping Harmful Image Exploitation and Limiting Distribution Act (the “Shield Act”). This is bicameral and bipartisan legislation that makes the nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images a federal crime.

Another gulf in our laws involves celebrity victims. We’re now seeing defendants try to claim that sharing nude images of celebrities is protected speech. With Pamela Anderson, we saw a court hideously claim that she had no legal rights because her body belonged to the public. We need the right of privacy to extend to everybody—whether you are a teacher, student, nurse, congress member, cashier, or supermodel.

You have our enthusiastic consent to share this newsletter with all of your friends. 

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

I am first a fraud or a trick. Or perhaps a blend of the two. Hello pals. This riddle has been rattling in my brain for a solid two days since watching The Batman, starring reformed vampire Robert Pattinson. The movie was pretty good if you’re into darkness and brooding.

Speaking of darkness, Jennifer Finney Boylan writes this week about the start of the most difficult time in recent memory—the start of the coronavirus pandemic, which unimaginably began two years ago on March 11. I still remember those early days when we thought it would last just few weeks; two pandemic puppies later, I’m still working in pajamas, and you may be too. Also in today’s letter, Julianne Escobedo Shepherd recommends some escapism for those of us who still need it.

Thoughts on The Batman (when I say thoughts, I mean please give me the riddle answer), the end of the pandemic or anything else? Send us some Batmail at [email protected].

—Shannon Melero

WHAT'S GOING ON (IN UKRAINE)

• A few updates on Ukraine: On Friday a fire broke out at Europe’s largest nuclear power plant after Russian troops seized the plant in Ukraine’s southeastern region. The Times reported later that morning that the fire had been extinguished and there are “no immediate signs” of radiation leaks at the plant. Russia’s president, whose name I shall not dignify by typing it out, claims that he will entertain a third round of talks with Ukrainian officials this weekend.

• Lending an unnecessary voice to the situation, Senator Lindsey Graham tweeted out his idea that a “Brutus” in Russia should kill the president because it’s “the only way this ends.” If I thought Graham had two brain cells to rub together I’d explain the history of coups and the power vacuums they produce, but my time on this earth is limited.

WHAT ELSE IS GOING ON

• A mosque attack in Peshawar has left 57 dead and over 100 injured after a man entered the mosque and detonated a suicide vest. This is one of the deadliest attacks carried out in Peshawar since 2014.

• Florida has re-entered the anti-abortion chat with a new bill that will ban abortions in the state after 15 weeks. Governor Ron DeSantis, patron of the “Dont Say Gay” bills, is supportive of this latest attack on reproductive rights.

• A Texas judge has temporarily halted a child abuse investigation into one family who was seeking out gender-affirming treatment for their child. The child’s mother, an employee of Texas’s Department of Family and Protective Services, was suspended after a decree in the state made helping a transgender child receive medical care a form of child abuse.
  

• But in Alabama, the legislature is moving forward with a bill that would make it a felony for a doctor to provide gender-affirming hormone treatments to any patient under 18.

• The only good news on the horizon for trans youth? The Biden administration is actually going to defend them and their parents through the Justice Department’s Office of Civil Rights. Don’t let the children down, Joseph.

AND: 

• Pamela Anderson has decided to tell her own story in her own words with a new Netflix documentary, after Hulu aired Pam and Tommy without Anderson’s blessing or input

• Hope Solo really, really wants everyone to know that she is not happy with the USWNT settlement, which she called “bullshit”

• I believe it was the lyricist Ludacris who said, “it’s going down, basement”—and that’s exactly the direction Trump is heading, after the January 6 Committee found he and his pals may have engaged in “criminal and or fraudulent acts”

• “Sex, drugs and activism: a history of queer resistance”

• Have you seen the new Bad Bunny trailer about a train carrying Bad Bunny?

TWO YEARS LATER

There’s No Vaccine for Stupid

The world we’re returning to is not the one we left

BY JENNIFER FINNEY BOYLAN

NURSES AT THE VA HOSPITAL IN THE BRONX, NEW YORK DEMANDING BETTER PROTECTION AT THE START OF THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC (PHOTO BY SPENCER PLATT VIA GETTY IMAGES)

​It was going to be just like old times. I’d been preparing for a reunion of my best friends from high school, that weekend in March 2020. The four of us—members of the class of 1976—were going to gather at a shore house in Atlantic City. My hope was that all those old faces might make me feel young.

Then I learned that, as of that Sunday night, there had been a total of 31 confirmed deaths from the virus in this country.

Damn, I thought. I guess we need to make another plan.

By Friday the 13th, my classes at Barnard had gone remote, and the reunion with the boys was canceled. I grabbed a ride with my daughter back to our home in Belgrade Lakes, Maine. And there, with a few exceptions, I would stay for the next twenty-two months. There was an election. There was an insurrection. There was an inauguration. I got two Moderna vaccines, and a Pfizer booster. There was Delta, and Omicron.

Finally, in New York at least, the number of cases began to subside. Like so many others, I began, tentatively, nervously, to return to the world.

This January, I found myself back on the Barnard campus, walking down the familiar corridor in my department known as the “English channel,” and trying my key, for the first time in almost two years, in the lock of my office door.

As it swung open, I thought of the description of archeologist Howard Carter opening the burial chamber of King Tutankhamun—100 years ago this November. “At first, I could see nothing, the hot air escaping from the chamber causing the candle flame to flicker,” he later wrote, “but presently, as my eyes grew accustomed to the light, details of the room within emerged slowly from the mist.”

A MEMORIAL IN AUGUST OF 2020 FOR THOSE WHO HAD DIED FROM COVID-19 (PHOTO BY MICHAEL M. SANTIAGO VIA GETTY IMAGES)

There they were: all the pieces of my life, right where I’d left them.  There was a stack of books I’d borrowed about Zora Neale Hurston, Barnard’s first African-American graduate; I’d been planning on writing a column about her.  There was a stack of graded papers I’d never returned to their authors.  On one wall was a long to-do list of things I had to write, and the deadlines.  There were details for the national book tour I was supposed to go on. That tour, of course, been cancelled, along with so many other things: my son’s in-person graduation from the University of Michigan, my daughter’s wedding.

For a moment I found it hard to remember the person I once had been.

I sat down at my desk, intending to get started with the semester’s business, but instead, I just sat there for a long moment, feeling the tears in my eyes. They were tears of sadness, of course, sadness for everything, and everyone, we’ve lost.  But they were also tears of rage.

This crisis ought to have been a time when we got to see how good people can be. And we did see that, in sacrifices big and small; health care workers, and grocery store employees, especially emerged as heroes. But so many others showed us their cruel and narcissistic sides instead: distrusting and hobbling government, when what we needed was good governance; mocking and questioning medicine, when what we needed was reliable science; and above all, singing the songs of conspiracy and selfishness at a time when what we needed above all was to be looking out for, and caring for, one another.

Like so many others, I began, tentatively, nervously, to return to the world.

The vast majority of people dying from COVID now are unvaccinated. With over 900,000 Americans dead, rather than publicizing the efficacy of vaccines, a whole cohort of frauds and blowhards has instead advocated horse de-wormer. Another genius suggests drinking your own urine. In Florida, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah, laws were put into effect preventing schools from mandating the masks that could hinder the spread of disease. Because freedom, I guess.

I am hopeful that COVID will eventually subside into something like the seasonal flu—an endemic virus that, within reason, we will be able to control and endure.

But how do we live with the knowledge that, at the moment of greatest crisis, so many of our fellow Americans opted for ignorance instead?

In fits and starts, we are slowly returning to our lives. But we are forever changed by what we have been through, and by what was revealed about so many of the people with whom we share this country.

What was revealed to you? Did you find new sources of resilience and hope?

I found some of that, to be sure. But I fear the pandemic has shaken me forever—not because of the disease itself, but because of what it forced me to see.

Omicron may be on the wane, but the virus of heartlessness and ignorance is thriving. It may yet end us all.

THE METEOR RECOMMENDS

Why I’m Binging a Fantasy Show About Druids

Brittania's Trippy Escapism

BY JULIANNE ESCOBEDO SHEPHERD

SOPHIE OKONEDO AS HEMPLE ON BRITANNIA (IMAGE VIA METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS/EPIX) 

Like a lot of people, the last two years of social distancing has turned me into a voracious television consumer. In the absence of seeing friends or going dancing, I just binged what seems like every show ever made and, thanks to glut and languishing, promptly forgot 95 percent of any given storyline. But one genre of TV has stuck with me: ancient historical fiction in which women are situated as the most powerful, interesting characters.

This week, Netflix released its sequel series to the great Vikings, Vikings: Valhalla, which is currently in its top two most-watched shows, and includes great fictional portrayals of real-life heroines Freydís Eiríksdóttir and Queen Emma of Normandy. I binged it, as well as the Netflix show The Last Kingdom (also about Vikings), but my favorite of all these early historical dramas is Britannia on Epix, which is set in 43 AD and concerns the Romans trying to get over on the Celtic Druids, who have a lot of tattoos. Britannia also has a fantastical element, with the Druids getting looped up on psychedelic brews and talking to their gods about prophecies, all to a classic rock soundtrack. (Its theme songs include Donovan’s “Hurdy Gurdy Man” and “Season of the Witch.")

But the plot mostly hinges on Cait (Eleanor Worthington Cox), a young Celtic girl who embarks on a mystical hero’s journey to discover she is the Chosen One, meant to protect the Druids from the murderous Romans and basically rescue all humanity from war along the way. Season three is airing now and I’m thrilled by it, particularly as it’s added the great Sophie Okonedo to the cast—she’s one of the best actors alive and is brilliant and terrifying as a powerful high priestess. Truly, I will proselytize to anyone about how much I love this show. I’ve been watching all the other stuff, too—ask me about 2020 when I saw approximately 236 episodes of Love Island in nine months—but the immersive and often funny tone of Britannia has hit my perfect escapist sweet spot. (Though, let’s be real: I am also just a sucker for a big budget and a tattoo.)

You can't spell friends without s-e-n-d! So be a pal and share this newsletter with all of your faves, we'd really appreciate it. 

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]

Hi, and welcome to the day after the State of the Union. Last night, Biden was in prime presidential form, which is to say his face was beat to the gods. On the issues, well—aside from his support of Ukraine, which included a solemn and moving ovation for UN ambassador Oksana Markarova, for me, his big shining moment was when he spoke up to defend trans kids and their parents via the Equality Act (though, as the journalist Katelyn Burns pointed out, the Equality Act won’t be passed as long as the filibuster exists).

Generally, I liked what Rep. Rashida Tlaib said in response to the speech: that Biden should use his executive powers to cancel student debt and reduce carbon emissions, and everyone needs to get back to enacting Build Back Better (which of course won’t *presses rewind* happen as long as the filibuster exists). Also, I learned that a lot of powerful people (including the President) still don’t know what Defund the Police actually means.

But more on that in the news below, along with Shannon Melero’s look at the current TV trend—via Inventing Anna and Hulu’s upcoming Elizabeth Holmes show—of pinkwashing female white-collar criminals with a girlboss sheen.

Hope that you and yours are well and safe.

—Julianne Escobedo Shepherd

WHAT'S GOING ON 

• The Russian military continues to batter Ukrainian cities in its full-scale war; according to the Kyiv Independent, the State Emergency Service estimates that over 2000 Ukrainian citizens have been killed so far, and both Ukrainian citizens and Russian troops are reportedly running out of food. Russian bombs have damaged residential buildings, schools, hospitals, and the Babyn Yar Holocaust Memorial, which commemorates the site where 33,000 Ukrainian Jews were murdered by Nazis.

• Meanwhile, Nigerian and Indian students attempting to escape Ukraine have been met with racism at the border and on trains, and trans Ukrainians find themselves unable to flee, fearful of transphobic attacks at the border if their gender identity does not match what’s on their passports. Disabled people, too, are having difficulty leaving Ukraine, according to Tanya Herasymova, who spoke here about what it was like to leave Ukraine while using a wheelchair.

• On Wednesday afternoon, the UN General Assembly condemned the Russian invasion and demanded Putin remove his troops; after President Zelensky filed suit at the Hague accusing Russia of war crimes, the International Criminal Court launched an investigation.

• The world’s outpouring for the crisis in Ukraine is entirely appropriate. But as many have pointed out, it’s hard not to feel dismayed at the way similar situations in non-white, non-European, or non-Judeo-Christian countries are largely ignored by the same media outlets that are covering the war in Ukraine 24/7. And in some cases, the coverage has been outright racist, with white newscasters emphasizing that this is “different” because the civilians affected “look like us.” The Arab and Middle Eastern Journalists Association (AMEJA) issued a condemnation of this racist coverage, as did the Foreign Press Association, Africa. So let’s do better by all affected populations; after all, in the last two weeks, the U.S. bombed Somalia, the Israeli military killed four Palestinians, including a 14-year-old boy, and the Afghan and Yemeni people are starving as a result of war there. To help refugees around the world, you can donate to Save the Children, the UN Refugee Agency, the International Rescue Committee, or Doctors Without Borders.

• Back to Ukraine: it’s been helpful to hear journalists remind us that it’s not a “conflict” or even a “war between” the countries: It’s Russia’s war on Ukraine. (And it’s not Kee-ev, which is the Russian pronunciation; it’s Kee-yiv, the way  Ukrainians pronounce it themselves.)

• Meanwhile, in the United States: the ACLU has filed its first lawsuit against Gov. Greg Abbott’s anti-trans decree, which encourages “child abuse” investigations into parents offering gender-affirming care to their trans kids. The ACLU is representing a plaintiff who works for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services—the actual agency tasked with investigating parents of trans kids—and who was placed on leave and investigated for supporting her own trans daughter. (And she’s not the only parent already being targeted, reports journalist Melissa Gira Grant.) One of the most reassuring voices heard this week was that of Dr. Megan Mooney, the Texas psychologist also named as a plaintiff in the lawsuit. She told The Guardian’s Katelyn Burns (again), that she’s advising her patients to “stay calm... I’m not reporting you, nobody is reporting you, and there are huge groups of people planning to support you and take care of you as always here in the state of Texas and elsewhere.” Bless everyone looking out for these kids and parents.

  AND:

• Latina curators are making their mark in America’s art museums

• HBO will air a new documentary about the 2017 death of Swedish journalist Kim Wall, who was murdered by a man she was interviewing in his submarine. Watch the trailer here, and if you’re unfamiliar with her remarkable journalism, you can read about that here.

• How Asian Americans changed fashion forever

• The New York Times printed a photograph of Venus Williams in a story about Serena Williams. (And, secondarily, referred to the best athlete of all time as, simply, “Tennis Star.") Politely, what the actual fuck? 

• Jessica Cisneros, the awesome young lawyer trying to unseat Rep. Henry Cuellar in South Texas, is headed to a primary runoff election in May. Cuellar is not only being investigated by the FBI, he is the last remaining “Democrat” in the House of Representatives who is anti-abortion. So this is one of the big races to watch. Did I mention Cisneros is awesome?

—JES

CRIME TIME

The Yas Queenification of White Women Scammers

There’s a reason we’re so fascinated with Anna Sorokin

BY SHANNON MELERO

JULIA GARNER AS ANNA DELVEY, JUDGING YOU FOR YOUR OUTFIT (IMAGE VIA NETFLIX) 

In 2018, when every New York glossy started covering the escapades of Anna Sorokin—a young woman who had defrauded her “friends” and several financial institutions (including City National Bank) by posing as a German heiress named Anna Delvey—I largely ignored it. The woes of New York’s elite monied classes simply weren’t of interest to me—that part of New York is so disconnected from what I know as a native New Yorker that it may as well be a fantasyland. If those over-educated Patagonia vest wearers got conned by some girl, that was their business. I saw no reason to engage with the Anna Delvey news cycle.

Ultimately, the joke was on me: Recently, I spent an entire weekend glued to Netflix’s Inventing Anna, a fictionalized version of the New York magazine story that first broke the news of Sorokin’s crimes. After a solid two days of talking at my husband (he didn’t watch, so I had to reenact some scenes for clarity) about all the different angles the series covers, it occurred to me that the whole thing functions as a bit of a Rorschach test: Is the viewer looking at a criminal or just a misunderstood girlboss?

If you haven’t seen the show or read the articles, think-pieces, and best-selling book about Anna Delvey, here’s the quick and dirty. Delvey got herself one step away from securing a $25 million loan from a bank to fund what she called the Anna Delvey Foundation, her concept for an exclusive social club for the mega-wealthy in New York. To create the illusion that she was a wealthy German heiress and hide the fact that she had no money and nowhere to live, Delvey (born in Russia) stayed in some of the most expensive hotels in New York City and skipped the bill at nearly every single one. She was arrested twice in 2017 for failure to make payment, and was ultimately found guilty of almost all of the charges brought against her, including first-degree attempted grand larceny, theft of services, and second-degree grand larceny—just to name a few. It is an incredible crime story that not even the writers’ room of Law and Order could have conceived, but what’s more fascinating is the story that came after the story: The heroic myth of Anna Delvey.

CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF ANNA WAS NOT CHARGED FOR THE CRIMINAL ACT THAT IS THIS EYELINER/MATTED LASH COMBO (IMAGE VIA NETFLIX)

Shaping the latest retelling of this myth is Inventing Anna creator Shonda Rhimes, who’s constructed a series that deals in a certain degree of subtle manipulation. One episode at a time, it chips away at the perspective that Sorokin is a scammer who got off easy (she served the minimum length of her sentence), giving her just enough girlboss and pseudo-feminist rhetoric to imply that maybe, just maybe, she was simply a savvy business person faking it till she made it.

What Inventing Anna manages to portray so expertly is the iron grip that girlbossery had over the masses during the 2010s, when Anna began her climb to and subsequent fall from the top. She is a scammer; there's no two ways about it. But her scam worked thanks to one nefarious aspect of girlbossology: because she is a white woman who came from nothing and almost created a social club without a dime to her name, she enjoyed a unique benefit of the doubt from bankers, hotel managers, socialites and the public—which is played up in the series.

And this is where Inventing Anna starts weaving in the girlboss narrative. TV Anna, played by Julia Garner, makes sweeping speeches about how women aren't taken seriously in business. Even as she sits in a prison cell, her reputation as an entrepreneur is more important to her than her freedom. One ancillary character describes the way Anna had to change her appearance—ditching the blonde for serious girl brunette, putting on glasses, wearing all-black power suits—to even be heard in the offices of some of the most powerful bankers and lawyers in New York, a strategy that somehow worked.

What Inventing Anna manages to portray so expertly is the iron grip that girlbossery had over the masses during the 2010s

This is one of the subtle manipulations happening in the show: it’s so easy to relate to this moment. Who among us hasn’t tweaked her appearance to some degree to be perceived a certain way in the workplace? These moments of relatability between Anna and the audience work as perfect distractors from the fact that she also took large sums of money from non-rich, non-white acquaintances who were left to pick up the pieces. The show even goes so far as to subtly place blame on these individuals by making it seem like they deserved what happened to them because they had benefited from their friendship with Anna. Instead of focusing on the nature of the crime, the focus is on transactional relationships—before you know it, you’re thinking about that one friend who is always out but never pays for anything. It’s truly a masterclass in don’t look over here, look over there! 

Inventing Anna’s affinity for Sorokin is put to its biggest test during the incident between Anna and Rachel Deloache Williams—a writer and friend of Anna who was allegedly scammed out of a large sum of money and eventually cooperated with the police to apprehend her—which functions as a sort of line in the sand in the series. You’re either on Rachel’s side or Anna’s side; there’s no room for middle ground. Rachel believed she was defrauded out of more than $60,000 on a trip to Morocco. Anna (and her attorney) painted Rachel as a weak social climber who was just mad that she had to pay for a lavish vacation that she had planned.

Now don’t get me wrong, in the Rachel episode, Anna’s behavior is deplorable and frightening. But as the series progresses, it tosses out tiny breadcrumbs in Anna’s defense and raises questions about Rachel’s responsibility in the Morocco ordeal. If Rachel could not afford her share of that suite, then why book it? Why did Rachel bring a work credit card on a personal vacation? What the fuck is up with that garden? Everyone is wrong, and no one is wrong. (Everyone is also a winner here: In real life, Williams turned a few pretty pennies for selling her story, and Anna Sorokin was found not guilty on that specific charge.)

KATIE LOWES AS RACHEL DELOACHE WILLIAMS (IMAGE VIA NETFLIX)

The series also makes abundantly clear that Anna could only achieve what she did because she was white and able to move in certain circles without anyone giving her a second glance. Her achievements are entirely rooted in her whiteness and ability to position herself close to powerful white men. This is one aspect of the storytelling that the show gets right. But her portrayal as a girlboss—an unyielding byproduct of feminism as corporate branding—is far too generous for someone who carried out a staggering amount of white-collar crimes in such a short amount of time. It’s an unearned framing that only worked because she was able to fool so many men and for that aspect alone, the series awards her a proverbial Yas Queen trophy. It’s also a stark contrast to the way creators are compelled to cover “bad” men like Bernie Madoff or all of the investor bros from The Big Short. Where is the philosophical exploration of their manhood being the biggest motivating factor for their actions?

On Thursday, March 3, another scorned girlboss will get the starlet treatment when Hulu releases its limited series on Elizabeth Holmes, The Dropout (there’s also a book and documentary about Holmes, if fiction doesn’t do it for you). It tells another story of another white woman who built another castle of sand, was praised as if she was the first woman in the history of women to accomplish anything, and watched it all come apart because she was selling her own pipe dream (and defrauding investors). I will absolutely watch it because I am a child of television, doomed to view whatever my overlords offer me. But underneath my own insatiable hunger for storytelling, I feel resistant to projects like The Dropout or Inventing Anna. It’s not that I’m against works that glorify crime—there are plenty of great movies about mobsters and murders (The Godfather is not one of them, come at me). Instead, it’s the implication that because these criminals are women, they are noteworthy in some way—or motivated by something greater, some higher calling from Lilith or Eve to commit crimes for the advancement of womankind. But sometimes, a crime is simply not that deep.

READER QUESTION WEDNESDAY!

Earlier this week, The Meteor held a briefing on the state of the caregiving crisis, which you can watch here. We’d love to hear from you on that issue. Tell us: Have you left your job in the past two years in order to care for a child or other family member? And if so, what would you have needed to be able to stay? Send your responses to [email protected], and we might feature your answer in next week’s newsletter.

We're new here and we'd appreciate it if you help us get by with a little help from your friends by sharing this newsletter with them.  

FOLLOW THE METEOR

Thank you for reading The Meteor! Got this from a friend? Sign up for your own copy, sent Wednesdays and Saturdays.

[email protected]